On Warwick Fox’s Assessment of Deep Ecology

Environmental Ethics 19 (1):69-85 (1997)

Abstract
I examine Fox’s tripartite characterization of deep ecology. His assessment abandons Naess’s emphasis upon the pluralism of ultimate norms by distilling what I refer to as the deep ecology approach to “Self-realization!” Contrary to Fox, I argue that his popular sense is distinctive and his formal sense is tenable. Fox’s philosophical sense, while distinctive, is neither necessary nor sufficient to adequately characterize the deep ecology approach. I contend that the deep ecology approach, as a formal approach to environmental philosophy, is not dependent upon and embodies much more than any single ultimate norm. I discuss how Naess’s deep ecology approach supports a wide diversity of ultimate norms. The only stipulation placed upon ultimate norms, to make them deep ecological ultimate norms, is that the so called deep ecology platform be derivable from them. The deep ecology approach is distinguished, in part, through its focus on diminishing environmentally degrading practices and policies by addressing root causes and by highlighting pseudo-conflicts. I present an interpretation of the deep ecology approach that hightlights Naess’s emphasis upon assisting individuals to arrive at thoroughly reasoned, consistent, and ecologically sound concrete decisions by supporting them in the articulation of their own personal ecological total views (ecosophies)
Keywords Applied Philosophy  General Interest
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s) 0163-4275
DOI 10.5840/enviroethics199719140
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 47,330
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

The Deep, Long-Range Ecology Movement 1960-2000?A Review.Bill Devall - 2001 - Ethics and the Environment 6 (1):18-41.
Naess's Deep Ecology: Implications for the Human Prospect and Challenges for the Future.Harold Glasser - 2011 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 54 (1):52-77.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

How Wide is Deep Ecology?John Clark - 1996 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 39 (2):189 – 201.
Deep Ecology and the Irrelevance of Morality.Eric H. Reitan - 1996 - Environmental Ethics 18 (4):411-424.
Naess's Deep Ecology Approach and Environmental Policy.Harold Glasser - 1996 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 39 (2):157 – 187.
Is There an Ecofeminism–Deep Ecology “Debate”?Deborah Slicer - 1995 - Environmental Ethics 17 (2):151-169.
Dōgen, Deep Ecology, and the Ecological Self.Deane Curtin - 1994 - Environmental Ethics 16 (2):195-213.
Deep Anthropology.Alan E. Wittbecker - 1986 - Environmental Ethics 8 (3):261-270.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
21 ( #449,895 of 2,291,077 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #580,277 of 2,291,077 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature