Biology and Philosophy 26 (2):201-222 (2011)
Grammar is now widely regarded as a substantially biological phenomenon, yet the problem of language evolution remains a matter of controversy among Linguists, Cognitive Scientists, and Evolutionary Theorists alike. In this paper, I present a new theoretical argument for one particular hypothesis—that a Language Acquisition Device of the sort first posited by Noam Chomsky might have evolved via the so-called Baldwin Effect . Close attention to the workings of that mechanism, I argue, helps to explain a previously mysterious feature of the Language Acquisition Device—the sheer variety of languages it allows the child to learn—thereby revealing a far stronger case than adherents of the hypothesis have previously supposed. A further unheralded consequence of the hypothesis is a conceptual shift in the Chomskyan understanding of language, wherein the essentially public nature of language is freshly emphasised. This has the effect of bringing the Chomskyan view into closer accord with Saussurean accounts of language, as well as with recent trends in evolutionary theory
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
Word and Object.Willard Van Orman Quine, Patricia Smith Churchland & Dagfinn Føllesdal - 2013 - MIT Press.
Evolution in Four Dimensions: Genetic, Epigenetic, Behavioral, and Symbolic Variation in the History of Life.Eva Jablonka, Marion J. Lamb & Anna Zeligowski - 2006 - Bradford.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Universal Grammar and the Critical Age.Julia Herschensohn - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (4):611-612.
A Game-Theoretic Analysis of the Baldwin Effect.Graciela Kuechle & Diego Rios - 2012 - Erkenntnis 77 (1):31-49.
Beyond the Baldwin Effect: James Mark Baldwin's 'Social Heredity', Epigenetic Inheritance, and Niche Construction.Paul Griffiths - 2003 - In Bruce H. Weber & David J. Depew (eds.), Evolution and Learning: The Baldwin Effect Reconsidered. MIT Press. pp. 193--215.
Universal Grammar: Hypothesis Space or Grammar Selection Procedures? Is UG Affected by Critical Periods?Gita Martohardjono, Samuel David Epstein & Suzanne Flynn - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (4):612-614.
Précis of Foundations of Language: Brain, Meaning, Grammar, Evolution,.Ray Jackendoff - 2003 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (6):651-665.
Added to index2010-07-26
Total downloads49 ( #107,090 of 2,172,036 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #325,337 of 2,172,036 )
How can I increase my downloads?