Vivisection as War: The Moral Diseases of Animal Experimentation and Slavery in British Victorian Quaker Pacifist Ethics

Society and Animals 20 (2):154-172 (2012)

This paper demonstrates how British Quakers, between 1870 and 1914, attempted to understand and debate the issue of vivisection through the lens of the Quaker peace testimony. Drawing on primary source materials, the article argues that these Friends were able to agitate for radical legislative and social change using virtue ethics as their framework. The paper further suggests that the moral parameters of the Quaker testimony for peace expanded briefly in this period to include interspecies as well as intraspecies engagement. Friends accomplished this by arguing that humans could not engage in vivisection—a “moral disease” just like slavery and war—without risking individual and social virtue. Friends were able to call for radical change in society without arguing for ethical egalitarianism. Hierarchy was implicit in their virtue ethic, but this did not hinder their creation of a forward-thinking stance on human-animal relations.
Keywords vivisection   Quakerism   pacifism   virtue ethics   slavery   hierarchy
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1163/156853012x631360
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 47,443
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Vivisection, Virtue Ethics, and the Law in 19th-Century Britain. Bates - 2014 - Journal of Animal Ethics 4 (2):30-44,.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles


Added to PP index

Total views
35 ( #264,367 of 2,292,016 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
6 ( #181,185 of 2,292,016 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes

Sign in to use this feature