Authors
Christopher Michaelson
University of St. Thomas, Minnesota
Abstract
Instructors of business ethics now have a wealth of cases and other pedagogical material to draw on to contribute to achieving ethics learning goals now required at most business schools. However, standard ethics case pedagogy seems to provide more guidance regarding the form and process for getting to a good answer than on the ethical content of the answer itself. Indeed, instructors often withhold their own judgments on what is a good answer so as not to indoctrinate students with the instructor’s views. To answer our question on what is a good answer to an ethical question, we asked three master teachers of business ethics to share their perspectives on a good answer. Their answers revealed stark differences—regarding the starting point of business ethics, the purpose of business, prioritization of analytical disciplines, and research methods—but also a common thread demanding that a good answer articulates a student's own moral voice. Moral voice is a genuine expression of an individual’s considered moral judgment that is reflective of personal values and cognizant of professional expectations. Cultivating the expression of moral voice goes beyond formal and theoretical proficiency to overcome human tendencies toward idealism, insincerity, and rationalization. Moral voice does not by itself fill the gap in business ethics pedagogy on the content of a good answer, but it demands that students support an answer that they can genuinely believe in while encouraging instructors to cultivate in their students sincerity and engagement, conscience, and a sense of self that are indispensable to genuine ethical commitment
Keywords Applied Philosophy  Business and Professional Ethics  Teaching Philosophy
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s) 1649-5195
DOI 10.5840/jbee2012912
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 51,756
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Is There “No Such Thing as Business Ethics”?Eric H. Beversluis - 1987 - Journal of Business Ethics 6 (2):81 - 88.
Varieties of Goodness at Work: The Relationship Between Business and Morality.Claus Beisbart - 2012 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 55 (4):405-430.
Is There a Special E-Commerce Ethics?Beverly Kracher & Cynthia L. Corritore - 2004 - Business Ethics Quarterly 14 (1):71-94.
Business is One Thing, Ethics is Another.George Bragues - 2005 - Business Ethics Quarterly 15 (2):179-203.
Action and Ethics Education.Robert Liebler - 2010 - Journal of Academic Ethics 8 (2):153-160.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2013-07-22

Total views
21 ( #465,848 of 2,333,944 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #585,936 of 2,333,944 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes