Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (5):644-647 (2003)

Abstract
Standard models of cognition are built from abstract, amodal, arbitrary symbols, and the meanings of those symbols are given solely by their interrelations. The target article (Glenberg 1997t) argues that these models must be inadequate because meaning cannot arise from relations among abstract symbols. For cognitive representations to be meaningful they must, at the least, be grounded; but abstract symbols are difficult, if not impossible, to ground. As an alternative, the target article developed a framework in which representations are grounded in perception and action, and hence are embodied. Recent work (Glenberg & Robertson 1999; 2000; Glenberg & Kaschak 2002; Kaschak & Glenberg 2000) extends this framework to language.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/s0140525x03240140
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 63,393
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Action Alters Shape Categories.Linda B. Smith - 2005 - Cognitive Science 29 (4):665-679.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
73 ( #146,871 of 2,448,960 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #443,144 of 2,448,960 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes