Philosophical Papers 37 (1):157-175 (2008)
Here is a very common philosophical opinion: being human plays no important role in moral thinking. Call this the anti-humanist thesis. I argue that a thirty-year old paper by Cora Diamond, ‘Eating Meat and Eating People' (‘EMEP') can help us to see that the anti-humanist thesis is false
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Five Arguments for Vegetarianism.William O. Stephens - 1994 - Philosophy in the Contemporary World 1 (4):25-39.
Vegetarianism, Traditional Morality, and Moral Conservatism.David Detmer - 2007 - Journal of Philosophical Research 32 (Supplement):39-48.
Moderation, Morals, and Meat.Frederick Ferré - 1986 - Inquiry : An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 29 (1-4):391-406.
The Vegetarian Savage: Rousseau's Critique of Meat Eating.David Boonin-Vail - 1993 - Environmental Ethics 15 (1):75-84.
Puppies, Pigs, and People: Eating Meat and Marginal Cases.Alastair Norcross - 2004 - Philosophical Perspectives 18 (1):229–245.
The Puzzle of Pure Moral Deference.Sarah McGrath - 2009 - Philosophical Perspectives 23 (1):321-344.
Added to index2010-07-27
Total downloads87 ( #59,720 of 2,168,616 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #82,721 of 2,168,616 )
How can I increase my downloads?