QBism and the limits of scientific realism

European Journal for Philosophy of Science 11 (2):1-19 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX


QBism is an agent-centered interpretation of quantum theory. It rejects the notion that quantum theory provides a God’s eye description of reality and claims instead that it imposes constraints on agents’ subjective degrees of belief. QBism’s emphasis on subjective belief has led critics to dismiss it as antirealism or instrumentalism, or even, idealism or solipsism. The aim of this paper is to consider the relation of QBism to scientific realism. I argue that while QBism is an unhappy fit with a standard way of thinking about scientific realism, an alternative conception I call “perspectival normative realism” may allow for a reconciliation.



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,296

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

QBism Is Not So Simply Dismissed.Ali Barzegar - 2020 - Foundations of Physics 50 (7):693-707.
QBism, phenomenology, and contextual quantum realism.И. Е Прись - 2023 - Siberian Journal of Philosophy 21 (1):13-42.
QBism : realism about what?Thomas Ryckman - 2023 - In Philipp Berghofer & Harald A. Wiltsche (eds.), Phenomenology and Qbism: New Approaches to Quantum Mechanics. New York, NY: Routledge.
A No-Go Result for QBism.Shan Gao - 2021 - Foundations of Physics 51 (5):1-6.
Quantum Bayesianism Assessed.John Earman - unknown - The Monist 102 (4):403-423.
The View from a Wigner Bubble.Eric G. Cavalcanti - 2021 - Foundations of Physics 51 (2):1-31.
Towards Better Understanding QBism.Andrei Khrennikov - 2018 - Foundations of Science 23 (1):181-195.


Added to PP

63 (#263,192)

6 months
18 (#152,778)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

David Glick
University of California, Davis

References found in this work

What we owe to each other.Thomas Scanlon - 1998 - Cambridge: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
What We Owe to Each Other.Thomas Scanlon - 2002 - Mind 111 (442):323-354.

View all 38 references / Add more references