Concepts: Where Subjectivism Goes Wrong: Hans-Johann Glock

Philosophy 84 (1):5-29 (2009)

Hans-Johann Glock
University of Zürich
The debate about concepts has always been shaped by a contrast between subjectivism, which treats them as phenomena in the mind or head of individuals, and objectivism, which insists that they exist independently of individual minds. The most prominent contemporary version of subjectivism is Fodor's RTM. The Fregean charge against subjectivism is that it cannot do justice to the fact that different individuals can share the same concepts. Proponents of RTM have accepted shareability as a ‘non-negotiable constraint’. At the same time they insist that by distinguishing between sign-types and – tokens the Fregean objection cannot just be circumvented but revealed to be fallacious. My paper rehabilitates the Fregean argument against subjectivism. The RTM response rests either on an equivocation of ‘concept’—between types which satisfy the non-negotiable constraint and tokens which are mental particulars in line with RTM doctrine—or on the untenable idea that one and the same entity can be both a shareable type and hence abstract and a concrete particular in the head. Furthermore, subjectivism cannot be rescued by adopting unorthodox metaphysical theories about the type/token and universal/particular contrasts. The final section argues that concepts are not representations or signs, but something represented by signs. Even if RTM is right to explain conceptual thinking by reference to the occurrence of mental representations, concepts themselves cannot be identical with such representations.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/S0031819109000011
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 46,373
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Can Animals Judge?Hans-Johann Glock - 2010 - Dialectica 64 (1):11-33.
Can Animals Judge?Hans-Johann Glock - 2010 - Dialectica 64 (1):11-33.
Simple Concepts.Pavel Materna - 2013 - Acta Analytica 28 (3):295-319.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles


Added to PP index

Total views
18 ( #509,114 of 2,286,177 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
6 ( #195,842 of 2,286,177 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes

Sign in to use this feature