Determining the primary problem of visual perception: A Gibsonian response to the correlation' objection
Philosophical Psychology 5 (1):69-94 (1992)
AbstractFodor & Pylyshyn (1981) criticize J. J. Gibson's ecological account of perception for failing to address what I call the 'correlation problem' in visual perception. That is, they charge that Gibson cannot explain how perceivers learn to correlate detectable properties of the light with perceptible properties of the environment. Furthermore, they identify the correlation problem as a crucial issue for any theory of visual perception, what I call a 'primary problem'—i.e. a problem which plays a definitive role in establishing the concerns of a particular scientific research program. If they are correct, Gibson's failure to resolve this problem would cast considerable doubt upon his ecological approach to perception. In response, I argue that both Fodor & Pylyshyn's problem itself and their proposed inferential solution embody a significant mistake which needs to be eliminated from our thinking about visual perception. As part of my response, I also suggest a Gibsonian alternative to Fodor & Pylyshyn's primary problem formulation
Similar books and articles
Visual Perception and Subjective Visual Awareness.Antti Revonsuo - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (6):769-770.
A Defense of a Non-Computational, Interactive Model of Visual Observation.Bonnie Tamarkin Paller - 1988 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1988:135 - 142.
How Direct is Visual Perception? Some Reflections on Gibson's 'Ecological Approach'.Jerry A. Fodor & Zenon W. Pylyshyn - 1981 - Cognition 9 (2):139-96.
The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception: Classic Edition.James J. Gibson - 1979 - Houghton Mifflin.
The Perception of Shape.David H. Sanford - 1983 - In Carl Ginet & Sydney Shoemaker (eds.), Knowledge And Mind: Phil Essays. Oxford University Press.
Affordances and the Body: An Intentional Analysis of Gibson's Ecological Approach to Visual Perception.Harry Heft - 1989 - Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 19 (1):1–30.
The Perception of Correlation in Scatterplots.Ronald A. Rensink & Gideon Baldridge - 2010 - Computer Graphics Forum 29:1203-1210.
Some Epistemological Aspects of Recent Work in Visual Perception.John Heffner - 1976 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1976:165 - 174.
Why Do Things Look as They Do? Some Gibsonian Answers to Koffka's Question.Thomas Natsoulas - 1991 - Philosophical Psychology 4 (2):183-202.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Are Monkeys Nomothetic or Idiographic?Linda Mealey - 1992 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 15 (1):161-161.
Mind Reading, Pretence and Imitation in Monkeys and Apes.A. Whiten - 1992 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 15 (1):170-171.
Précis of How Monkeys See the World.Dorothy L. Cheney & Robert M. Seyfarth - 1992 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 15 (1):135-147.
Theory of Society, Yes, Theory of Mind, No.Hans G. Furth - 1992 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 15 (1):155-156.
On Attributing Mental States to Monkeys: First, Know Thyself.Daniel J. Povinelli & Sandra deBlois - 1992 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 15 (1):164-166.
References found in this work
A Treatise of Human Nature: Being an Attempt to Introduce the Experimental Method of Reasoning Into Moral Subjects.David Hume & D. G. C. Macnabb (eds.) - 1738 - Collins.