Fifty Years of Quine’s Two Dogmas

Rodopi (2003)
Hans-Johann Glock
University of Zürich
Geert Keil
Humboldt-University, Berlin
Kathrin Glüer-Pagin
Stockholm University
W. V. Quine’s “Two Dogmas of Empiricism”, first published in 1951, is one of the most influential articles in the history of analytic philosophy. It does not just question central semantic and epistemological views of logical positivism and early analytic philosophy, it also marks a momentous challenge to the ideas that conceptual analysis is a main task of philosophy and that philosophy is an a priori discipline which differs in principle from the empirical sciences. These ideas dominated early analytic philosophy, but similar views are to be found in the Kantian tradition, in phenomenology and in philosophical hermeneutics. In questioning this consensus from the perspective of a radical empiricism, Quine’s article has had a sustained and lasting impact across all these philosophical divisions. Quine himself moved from the abandonment of the analytic/synthetic distinction to a thoroughgoing naturalism, and many analytic philosophers have followed his lead. The current collection differs from other anthologies devoted to Quine in two respects. On the one hand, it focuses on his attack on analyticity, apriority and necessity; on the other, it considers implications of that attack that far transcend the limits of Quine scholarship, and lie at the heart of the current self-understanding of philosophy. The contributors include both opponents and proponents of the dichotomies attacked by Quine. Furthermore, they include both eminent figures such as Boghossian, Burge, and Davidson, and up and coming younger philosophers
Keywords Quine, W. V  Analytic / synthetic distinction  Two Dogmas of Empiricism
Categories (categorize this paper)
Buy the book $91.47 direct from Amazon (19% off)   $99.00 used (18% off)   $484.51 new    Amazon page
ISBN(s) 9789042009486   9042009489   9789042009486   9042009489
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

‘‘Quine’s Evolution From ‘Carnap’s Disciple’ to the Author of “Two Dogmas.Greg Frost-Arnold - 2011 - Hopos: The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science 1 (2):291-316.
Analyticity, Carnap, Quine, and Truth.Marian David - 1996 - Philosophical Perspectives 10:281 - 296.
Quine on the Analytic/Synthetic Distinction.Stefanie Rocknak - 2013 - Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Two Dogmas of Empiricism. Fifty Years After.Herbert Schnädelbach - 2003 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 66 (1):7-12.
Analyticity Reconsidered.Paul Artin Boghossian - 1996 - Noûs 30 (3):360-391.
W.V.O.Quine.Alex Orenstein - 2002 - Routledge.
Quine's 'Two Dogmas of Empiricism'.Geoffrey Hunter - 1995 - Philosophical Investigations 18 (4):305-328.
From Within and From Without. Two Perspectives on Analytic Sentences.Olaf L. Müller - 2002 - In Wolfram Hinzen & Hans Rott (eds.), Belief and meaning: Essays at the interface. Deutsche Bibliothek der Wissenschaften.
Distinguishing W.V. Quine and Donald Davidson.James Pearson - 2011 - Journal for the History of Analytical Philosophy 1 (1):1-22.


Added to PP index

Total downloads
87 ( #70,430 of 2,263,131 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
10 ( #36,741 of 2,263,131 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature