The Whole Story Either Kant is not a critical philosopher or “critical” does not mean what Kant says it does
Kant Studien 98 (1):1-39 (2007)
AbstractIn what respect, if any, is Kant a distinctively “critical” thinker? How does Kant’s “transcendentalism” differentiate his practice in metaphysics from that of the philosophers of the Cartesian tradition? How much does the success of Kant’s enterprise depend on the viability of the idea of the synthetic a priori? The issues that these questions raise came to a head for Kant in the attack on his novelty by the Leibnizean Johann August Eberhard, an attack to which Kant responded at length in the sarcastically titled On a discovery according to which any new critique of pure reason has been made superfluous by an earlier one. Unfortunately, Kant’s apology is quite inconclusive. In this discussion, in an effort to shed some light on the murk, I supply text-sensitive analyses of the various key notions. It emerges that while, as Eberhard complained, the “critical” turn is not at all a methodological novelty, Kant’s procedure does mark a departure from traditional metaphysics, though not one that he himself describes at all clearly. Kant’s “transcendentalism” ultimately constitutes an open-ended and ever-widening interrogation of logical possibility; hence an interrogation that, contrary to what Kant himself claims, can never furnish what legitimately counts as “proof.”
Similar books and articles
Origem da acepção do dogmatismo em Kant.Claudio Sehnem - 2011 - Problemata Revista Internacional de Filosofia 2 (02):238 -260.
What Does Kant Mean by ‘Power of Judgement’ in his Critique of the Power of Judgement?Thomas Teufel - 2012 - Kantian Review 17 (2):297-326.
Kant's Early Critics: The Empiricist Critique of the Theoretical Philosophy.Brigitte Sassen (ed.) - 2000 - Cambridge University Press.
"Review of" Kant Trouble: The Obscurities of the Enlightened". [REVIEW]Elizabeth Millán-Zaibert - 2002 - Essays in Philosophy 3 (2):5.
Kant's critique of the Leibnizian philosophy : Contra the Leibnizians, but pro Leibniz.Anja Jauernig - 2008 - In Daniel Garber & Béatrice Longuenesse (eds.), Kant and the Early Moderns. Princeton, NJ, USA: Princeton University Press. pp. 41-63 (and 214-223 notes).
Constituting Critique: Kant’s Writing as Critical Praxis.Eric J. Schwab (ed.) - 1994 - Duke University Press.
Leibniz Freed of Every Flaw: A Kantian Reads Leibnizian Metaphysics.Anja Jauernig - 2004 - Dissertation, Princeton University
¿Era tan pre-crítico el Kant precrítico? Posiciones no dogmáticas en la reflexión sobre el conocimiento.María Luisa Posada Kubisa - 2011 - Revista de Filosofía (Madrid) 35 (2):7-25.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads