The Whole Story Either Kant is not a critical philosopher or “critical” does not mean what Kant says it does

Kant Studien 98 (1):1-39 (2007)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In what respect, if any, is Kant a distinctively “critical” thinker? How does Kant’s “transcendentalism” differentiate his practice in metaphysics from that of the philosophers of the Cartesian tradition? How much does the success of Kant’s enterprise depend on the viability of the idea of the synthetic a priori? The issues that these questions raise came to a head for Kant in the attack on his novelty by the Leibnizean Johann August Eberhard, an attack to which Kant responded at length in the sarcastically titled On a discovery according to which any new critique of pure reason has been made superfluous by an earlier one. Unfortunately, Kant’s apology is quite inconclusive. In this discussion, in an effort to shed some light on the murk, I supply text-sensitive analyses of the various key notions. It emerges that while, as Eberhard complained, the “critical” turn is not at all a methodological novelty, Kant’s procedure does mark a departure from traditional metaphysics, though not one that he himself describes at all clearly. Kant’s “transcendentalism” ultimately constitutes an open-ended and ever-widening interrogation of logical possibility; hence an interrogation that, contrary to what Kant himself claims, can never furnish what legitimately counts as “proof.”

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 76,297

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Origem da acepção do dogmatismo em Kant.Claudio Sehnem - 2011 - Problemata Revista Internacional de Filosofia 2 (02):238 -260.
Kant for Everyman.Willibald Klinke - 1951 - Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Kant's critique of the Leibnizian philosophy : Contra the Leibnizians, but pro Leibniz.Anja Jauernig - 2008 - In Daniel Garber & Béatrice Longuenesse (eds.), Kant and the Early Moderns. Princeton, NJ, USA: Princeton University Press. pp. 41-63 (and 214-223 notes).
Kant’s Regulative Spinozism.Omri Boehm - 2012 - Kant Studien 103 (3):292-317.
Kant on Negative Magnitudes.Melissa Zinkin - 2012 - Kant Studien 103 (4):397-414.
Immanuel Kant.Marshall Farrier (ed.) - 1994 - State University of New York Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
64 (#188,263)

6 months
1 (#450,425)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Mark Glouberman
Kwantlen Polytechnic University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references