Christian Bioethics 18 (3):312-324 (2012)

Authors
Vasil Gluchman
Comenius University In Bratislava (Doctorate)
Abstract
The basis for the analysis is the approach of Christian ethics toward the issue of the human body and sexuality. Based on the views of some present-day Christian, especially Protestant, ethicists, the author points out the effort to establish this area in contemporary Christian theology and ethics, which is, for instance, represented by the theology of sexuality and Christian sexual ethics. Consequently, the author pays attention to the opinions of the significant Slovak Lutheran theologian and ethicist Igor Kišš and his theory of humanized deontology. Within this framework, he studies his opinions on the issue of the human body, sexuality, artificial insemination, genetic engineering, and embryonic stem cell research. The author comes to the conclusion that Kišš has created a highly modern and liberal theory of Protestant ethics based on the principle of humanity (love to one’s neighbor) as a central principle. The principle of humanity, together with the emphasis on the examination of consequences and a potential need for the lesser evil, aims at giving reasons for a possible diversion from rigorous extreme deontology. This creates space for accepting liberal views within Christianity or Protestantism, which, however, must be in accordance with the value of humanity. The author claims that Kišš’s theory of humanized deontology is a theological version of ethics of social consequences (a kind of nonutilitarian consequentialism)
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1093/cb/cbs024
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 53,682
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Body in Bioethics.Alastair V. Campbell - 2009 - Routledge-Cavendish.
Body and Representation.Insa Härtel & Sigrid Schade (eds.) - 2002 - Leske + Budrich.
From Phantom Limb to Phantom Body: Varieties of Extracorporeal Awareness.Peter Brugger - 2006 - In Günther Knoblich, Ian M. Thornton, Marc Grosjean & Maggie Shiffrar (eds.), Human Body Perception From the Inside Out. Oxford University Press. pp. 171-209.
Attunement Through the Body.Shigenori Nagatomo - 1992 - State University of New York Press.
The Demands of Deontology Are Not So Paradoxical.Judith Andre - 1991 - Journal of Philosophical Research 16:407-410.
Feminism and the Body.Londa L. Schiebinger (ed.) - 2000 - Oxford University Press.
In Defense of Deontology and Kant: A Reply to Van Staveren.Mark D. White - 2009 - Review of Political Economy 21 (2):315-323.
Beyond the Body Schema: Visual, Prosthetic, and Technological Contributions to Bodily Perception and Awareness.Nicholas P. Holmes & Charles Spence - 2006 - In Günther Knoblich, Ian M. Thornton, Marc Grosjean & Maggie Shiffrar (eds.), Human Body Perception From the Inside Out. Oxford University Press. pp. 15-64.
The Professional.Subroto Bagchi - 2009 - Penguin Portfolio.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2012-11-16

Total views
45 ( #213,889 of 2,349,499 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #510,673 of 2,349,499 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes