What is right with 'bayes net methods' and what is wrong with 'hunting causes and using them'?


Authors
Clark Glymour
Carnegie Mellon University
Abstract
Nancy Cartwright's recent criticisms of efforts and methods to obtain causal information from sample data using automated search are considered. In addition to reviewing that effort, I argue that almost all of her criticisms are false and rest on misreading, overgeneralization, or neglect of the relevant literature
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1093/bjps/axp039
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 43,049
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Making Things Happen.James Woodward - 2005 - Philosophical Review 114 (4):545-547.

View all 23 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Identifying Intervention Variables.Michael Baumgartner & Isabelle Drouet - 2013 - European Journal for Philosophy of Science 3 (2):183-205.

View all 7 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2010-02-13

Total views
100 ( #78,956 of 2,260,175 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #905,492 of 2,260,175 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature