Theoria 18 (2):199-206 (2003)
I offer some brief remarks in reply to comments and criticisms of my earlier work on logical consequence and logical constants. I concentrate on criticisms, especially García-Carpintero’s charge that myviews make no room for modal intuitions about logical consequence, and Sher’s attempted rebuttal of my critique of her theory of logical constants. I show that García-Carpintero’s charge is based on misunderstandings, and that Sher’s attempted rebuttal actually reveals new problems for her theory
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
The Phenomenological Uniqueness of the Holocaust: Some Philosophical Remarks on Katz's The Holocaust in Historical Context.Simon Evnine - unknown
Remarks on Some Approaches to the Concept of Logical Consequence.Dag Prawitz - 1985 - Synthese 62 (2):153 - 171.
Logical Theory and Semantic Analysis: Essays Dedicated to Stig Kanger on His Fiftieth Birthday.Stig Kanger & Sören Stenlund (eds.) - 1974 - Reidel.
The Problem of Logical Constants.Mario Gomez-Torrente - 2002 - Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 8 (1):1-37.
Gómez-Torrente on Modality and Tarskian Logical Consequence.Manuel García-Carpintero - 2003 - Theoria 18 (2):159-170.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads61 ( #86,349 of 2,171,921 )
Recent downloads (6 months)8 ( #36,681 of 2,171,921 )
How can I increase my downloads?