Theoria 18 (2):199-206 (2003)

Mario Gomez-Torrente
National Autonomous University of Mexico
I offer some brief remarks in reply to comments and criticisms of my earlier work on logical consequence and logical constants. I concentrate on criticisms, especially García-Carpintero’s charge that myviews make no room for modal intuitions about logical consequence, and Sher’s attempted rebuttal of my critique of her theory of logical constants. I show that García-Carpintero’s charge is based on misunderstandings, and that Sher’s attempted rebuttal actually reveals new problems for her theory
Keywords Analytic Philosophy  Philosophy of Science
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2010
ISBN(s) 0495-4548  
DOI theoria200318217
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 56,060
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Problem of Logical Constants.Mario Gómez-Torrente - 2002 - Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 8 (1):1-37.
A Note on Formality and Logical Consequence.Mario Gómez-Torrente - 2000 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 29 (5):529-539.
On a Fallacy Attributed to Tarski.Mario Gómez-Torrente - 1998 - History and Philosophy of Logic 19 (4):227-234.

View all 15 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Invariance and Logicality in Perspective.Gila Sher - forthcoming - In Gil Sagi & Jack Woods (eds.), The Semantic Conception of Logic: Essays on Consequence, Invariance, and Meaning. Cambridge, Britain: Cambridge University Press.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles


Added to PP index

Total views
183 ( #51,061 of 2,403,706 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
17 ( #43,435 of 2,403,706 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes