Categories and facets in integrative levels

Axiomathes 18 (2):177-192 (2008)
  Copy   BIBTEX


Facets and general categories used in bibliographic classification have been based on a disciplinary organization of knowledge. However, facets and categories of phenomena independent from disciplines can be identified similarly. Phenomena can be classified according to a series of integrative levels (layers), which in turn can be grouped into the major strata of form, matter, life, mind, society and culture, agreeing with Nicolai Hartmann’s ontology. Unlike a layer, a stratum is not constituted of elements of the lower ones; rather, it represents the formal pattern of the lower ones, like the horse hoof represents the shape of the steppe. Bibliographic categories can now be seen in the light of level theory: some categories are truly general, while others only appear at a given level, being the realization of a general category in the specific context of the level: these are the facets of that level. In the notation of the Integrative Level Classification project, categories and facets are represented by digits, and displayed in a Web interface with the help of colours.



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,931

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library


Added to PP

66 (#251,873)

6 months
4 (#862,463)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Claudio Gnoli
Universita' degli Studi di Pavia

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The case for case, dins.Charles J. Fillmore - 1968 - In Emmon Bach & R. Harms (eds.), Universals in Linguistic Theory. Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
New ways of ontology.Nicolai Hartmann - 1953 - Westport, Conn.: Greenwood Press.
Levels.Roberto Poli - 1998 - Axiomathes 9 (1-2):197-211.
Levels of reality and levels of representation.Claudio Gnoli & Roberto Poli - 2004 - Knowledge Organization 31 (3):151-160.

View all 8 references / Add more references