Topics in Cognitive Science 9 (2):522-532 (2017)

Abstract
Newell argued that progress in psychology was slow because research focused on experiments trying to answer binary questions, such as serial versus parallel processing. In addition, not enough attention was paid to the strategies used by participants, and there was a lack of theories implemented as computer models offering sufficient precision for being tested rigorously. He proposed a three-headed research program: to develop computational models able to carry out the task they aimed to explain; to study one complex task in detail, such as chess; and to build computational models that can account for multiple tasks. This article assesses the extent to which the papers in this issue advance Newell's program. While half of the papers devote much attention to strategies, several papers still average across them, a capital sin according to Newell. The three courses of action he proposed were not popular in these papers: Only two papers used computational models, with no model being both able to carry out the task and to account for human data; there was no systematic analysis of a specific video game; and no paper proposed a computational model accounting for human data in several tasks. It is concluded that, while they use sophisticated methods of analysis and discuss interesting results, overall these papers contribute only little to Newell's program of research. In this respect, they reflect the current state of psychology and cognitive science. This is a shame, as Newell's ideas might help address the current crisis of lack of replication and fraud in psychology.
Keywords Video games  Strategy  Expertise  Unified theory of cognition  Cognitive modeling  Cognitive architecture  Chess
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/tops.12265
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 50,241
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Long-Term Working Memory.K. Anders Ericsson & Walter Kintsch - 1995 - Psychological Review 102 (2):211-245.

View all 23 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Toward a Unified View of Cognitive Control.Dario D. Salvucci & Niels A. Taatgen - 2011 - Topics in Cognitive Science 3 (2):227-230.
Newell's Program, Like Hilbert's, is Dead; Let's Move On.Yingrui Yang & Selmer Bringsjord - 2003 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (5):627-627.
Unified Theories of Cognition.Allen Newell - 1990 - Harvard University Press.
A Multilevel Approach to Modeling Human Cognition.Hongbin Wang, Todd R. Johnson & Jiajie Zhang - 2003 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (5):626-627.
Video Games and the Philosophy of Art.Aaron Smuts - 2005 - American Society for Aesthetics Newsletter.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2017-03-21

Total views
7 ( #960,680 of 2,325,144 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #671,788 of 2,325,144 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes