Thinking and Reasoning 14 (4):395-408 (2008)

Abstract
In a famous study of expert problem solving, de Groot (1946/1978) examined how chess players found the best move. He reported that there was little difference in the way that the best players (Grand Masters) and very good players (Candidate Masters) searched the board. Although this result has been regularly cited in studies of expertise, it is frequently misquoted. It is often claimed that de Groot found no difference in the way that experts and novices investigate a problem. Comparison of expert and novice chess players on de Groot's problem shows that there are clear differences in their search patterns. We discuss the troublesome theoretical and practical consequences of incorrectly reporting de Groot's findings
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2008
DOI 10.1080/13546780802265547
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 50,100
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

View all 7 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2010-07-27

Total views
72 ( #127,035 of 2,324,383 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #685,305 of 2,324,383 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes