A Conceptual Approach for a Quantitative Economic Analysis of Farmers’ Decision-Making Regarding Animal Welfare

Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 27 (2):287-308 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Decisions related to animal welfare standards depend on farmer’s multiple goals and values and are constrained by a wide range of external and internal forces. The aim of this paper is twofold, i.e., to develop a theoretical framework for farmers’ AW decisions that incorporates farmers’ goals, use and non-use values and to present an approach to empirically implement the theoretical framework. The farmer as a head of the farm household makes choices regarding production to maximize the utility of the household. The overall utility of the farmer is determined by his multiple objectives. For the analysis of multi-objective problems, the multiple criteria decision - making paradigm provides an appropriate theoretical framework. However, theories from the field of social-psychology are needed to facilitate the identification of all relevant aspects in the decision making. The practical use of the conceptual framework is demonstrated using a simple numerical application of a multi-objective programming model. Two workshops were devoted to examining the scientific consistency and the practical usefulness of the approach. Implementing this approach will increase knowledge of the main factors and barriers that determine farmers’ decisions with regard to AW standards. This knowledge is relevant during the development of new AW concepts that aims to supply products that comply with above-legal AW standards for middle-market segments

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,616

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

For the love of goats: the advantages of alterity. [REVIEW]Ann Finan - 2011 - Agriculture and Human Values 28 (1):81-96.
Animal Welfare: Ends and Means.Roger Cryan - 1997 - Dissertation, University of Florida
The impact of BSE and FMD on ethics and democratic process.Jo Murphy-Lawless - 2004 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 17 (4-5):385-403.
A Critique of FAWC’s Five Freedoms as a Framework for the Analysis of Animal Welfare.Steven P. McCulloch - 2013 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 26 (5):959-975.
Animal Welfare, Trust, Governance, and the Public Good: Putting Ethics to Task.Raymond Anthony - 2007 - The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 1:275-280.
Animal Welfare, Trust, Governance, and the Public Good.Raymond Anthony - 2007 - The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 1:275-280.
Death is a welfare issue.James W. Yeates - 2010 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 23 (3):229-241.
The sciences of animal welfare.David J. Mellor - 2009 - Ames, Iowa: Wiley-Blackwell. Edited by Emily Patterson-Kane & Kevin J. Stafford.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-09-05

Downloads
41 (#339,849)

6 months
3 (#445,838)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Herman Saatkamp
Vanderbilt University (PhD)