David Godden
Michigan State University
Jan Albert van Laar and Erik Krabbe’s paper “Splitting a difference of opinion” studies an important type of dialogue shift, namely that from a deliberation dialogue over action or policy options where critical and persuasive argumentation is exchanged about the rational acceptability of the policy options proposed by various parties, to a negotiation dialogue where agreement is reached by a series of compromises, or trade-offs, on the part of each side in the disagreement.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 62,388
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

On the Possibility of Principled Moral Compromise.Daniel Weinstock - 2013 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 16 (4):537-556.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Dialogue Foundations: Dialogue Logic Revisited: Erik C. W. Krabbe.Erik C. W. Krabbe - 2001 - Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 75 (1):33–49.
II—Erik C. W. Krabbe: Dialogue Logic Revisited.Erikc Krabbe - 2001 - Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 75 (1):33-49.
Criticism in Need of Clarification.Jan Albert van Laar - 2014 - Argumentation 28 (4):401-423.


Added to PP index

Total views
29 ( #374,817 of 2,445,453 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #457,182 of 2,445,453 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes