Southern Journal of Philosophy 17 (2):163-174 (1979)
In two of his more recent papers, Donald davidson has argued for the "a priori" truth of what he calls "the principle of the anomalism of the mental." my concern in this paper is with examining that principle and davidson's defense of it. After clarifying the principle, I discuss three considerations which davidson gives in its defense and argue that they are not persuasive. Then I argue that although the principle of the anomalism of the mental cannot be known "a priori" to be true, There are some arguments and some neurophysiological evidence which make it reasonable to believe that the principle is, Indeed, True
|Keywords||Anomaly Laws Mental Metaphysics Davidson, D Grandy, R|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
The Inten(T/s)Ionality of Davidson's Mental.Stephen Sommerville - 1980 - Philosophical Papers 9 (October):46-59.
On Davidson's Response to the Charge of Epiphenomenalism.Brian P. McLaughlin - 1992 - In John Heil & Alfred R. Mele (eds.), Mental Causation. Oxford University Press.
Primary Reasons: From Radical Interpretation to a Pure Anomalism of the Mental.Gerhard Preyer - 2000 - ProtoSociology 14:158-179.
Honderich on Mental Events and Psychoneural Laws.Jaegwon Kim - 1989 - Inquiry : An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 32 (March):29-48.
Anomalism, Supervenience, and Davidson on Content-Individuation.Mark Rowlands - 1990 - Philosophia 20 (3):295-310.
Does Externalism Entail the Anomalism of the Mental?Nicholas Shea - 2003 - Philosophical Quarterly 53 (211):201-213.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads32 ( #162,434 of 2,178,170 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #112,524 of 2,178,170 )
How can I increase my downloads?