Informal Logic 28 (1):6-19 (2008)

Authors
David Godden
Michigan State University
Abstract
While defeasibility in legal reasoning has been the subject of recent scholarship, it has yet to be studied in the context of judicial opinion. Yet, being subject to appeal, judicial decisions can default for a variety of reasons. Prakken (2001) argued that the defeasibility affecting reasoning involved in adversarial legal argumentation is best analysed as procedural rather than logical. In this paper we argue that the defeasibility of ratio decendi is similarly best explained and modeled in a procedural and dialectical framework. We propose that appeals are best understood as meta-dialogues about the reasoned dialogue occurring in the initial trial
Keywords defeasibility, judicial opinion, legal reasoning, meta-dialogue, open-textured, ratio decendi
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 71,316
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Concept of Law.Hla Hart - 1961 - Oxford University Press.
Fallacies.Charles Leonard Hamblin - 1970 - London, England: Vale Press.
The Concept of Law.Hla Hart - 1961 - Oxford University Press UK.
Fallacies.C. L. Hamblin - 1970 - Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 160:492-492.
Legal Reasoning and Legal Theory.Neil MacCormick (ed.) - 1978 - Oxford University Press.

View all 18 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Defeasibility in Legal Reasoning.Giovanni Sartor - 2012 - In Jordi Ferrer Beltrán & Giovanni Battista Ratti (eds.), The Logic of Legal Requirements: Essays on Defeasibility. Oxford University Press.
Law and Defeasibility.Jaap Hage - 2003 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 11 (2-3):221-243.
Defeasibility and Open Texture.Brian H. Bix - 2012 - In Jordi Ferrer Beltrán & Giovanni Battista Ratti (eds.), The Logic of Legal Requirements: Essays on Defeasibility. Oxford University Press.
Formal Aspects of Legal Reasoning.A. Soeteman - 1995 - Argumentation 9 (5):731-746.
Legal Defeasibility and the Connection Between Law and Morality.José Juan Moreso - 2012 - In Jordi Ferrer Beltrán & Giovanni Battista Ratti (eds.), The Logic of Legal Requirements: Essays on Defeasibility. Oxford University Press.
Reasons for Action and Defeasibility.María Cristina Redondo - 2012 - In Jordi Ferrer Beltrán & Giovanni Battista Ratti (eds.), The Logic of Legal Requirements: Essays on Defeasibility. Oxford University Press.
Against Defeasibility of Legal Rules.Jorge L. Rodríguez - 2012 - In Jordi Ferrer Beltrán & Giovanni Battista Ratti (eds.), The Logic of Legal Requirements: Essays on Defeasibility. Oxford University Press.
Defeasibility and Legal Indeterminacy.Pierluigi Chiassoni - 2012 - In Jordi Ferrer Beltrán & Giovanni Battista Ratti (eds.), The Logic of Legal Requirements: Essays on Defeasibility. Oxford University Press.
Defeasibility and Legal Positivism.Wilfrid J. Waluchow - 2012 - In Jordi Ferrer Beltrán & Giovanni Battista Ratti (eds.), The Logic of Legal Requirements: Essays on Defeasibility. Oxford University Press.
Defeasibility and Adjudication.Richard H. S. Tur - 2012 - In Jordi Ferrer Beltrán & Giovanni Battista Ratti (eds.), The Logic of Legal Requirements: Essays on Defeasibility. Oxford University Press.
Is Defeasibility an Essential Property of Law?Frederick Schauer - 2012 - In Jordi Ferrer Beltrán & Giovanni Battista Ratti (eds.), The Logic of Legal Requirements: Essays on Defeasibility. Oxford University Press.
Defeasibility, Axiological Gaps, and Interpretation.Riccardo Guastini - 2012 - In Jordi Ferrer Beltrán & Giovanni Battista Ratti (eds.), The Logic of Legal Requirements: Essays on Defeasibility. Oxford University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2013-11-24

Total views
23 ( #495,324 of 2,519,512 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #407,153 of 2,519,512 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes