Topoi 40 (5):845-858 (2021)

David Godden
Michigan State University
Disputational models of argumentation have been criticized as introducing adversariality into argumentation by mistakenly conceiving of it as minimally adversarial, and, in doing so, structurally incentivizing ancillary adversariality. As an alternative, non-adversarial models of argumentation like inquiry have been recommended. In this article I defend disputational, minimally adversarial models of disagreement-based argumentation. First, I argue that the normative kernel of minimal adversariality is properly located in the normative fabric of disagreement, not our practices of disputation. Thus, argumentation’s minimal adversariality is a hereditary, rather than an acquired, trait. Second, I show how attempts to model disagreement-based argumentation non-adversarially, as co-inquiry, misrepresent the normative commitments of disagreers. Indeed, such attempts backfire in their efforts to make argumentation less adversarial, by removing the normative, discursive mechanisms by which we may hold each other to rational account for our commitments. Finally, I show how regulative models of disputation, like the Pragma-Dialectical critical discussion, are designed to minimize ancillary adversariality thereby preventing its escalation.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s11245-021-09768-9
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Translate to english
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 71,259
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Justice, Gender and the Family.Susan Moller Okin - 1989 - Hypatia 8 (1):209-214.

View all 37 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Burdens of Proposing.David Godden & Simon Wells - 2022 - Informal Logic 42 (1):291-342.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Adversariality and Argumentation.John Casey - 2020 - Informal Logic 40 (1):77-108.
Toward Understanding Reasoned Resolution of Disagreement.Don Fawkes - 2006 - Philosophy in the Contemporary World 13 (1):56-62.
Wittgenstein and the Logic of Deep Disagreement.David Godden & William H. Brenner - 2010 - Cogency: Journal of Reasoning and Argumentation 2:41-80.
Chinese Buddhist Religious Disputation.Mary M. Garrett - 1997 - Argumentation 11 (2):195-209.


Added to PP index

Total views
7 ( #1,071,534 of 2,518,481 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
5 ( #137,673 of 2,518,481 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes