Filozofija I Društvo 23 (2):65-76 (2012)
Authors |
|
Abstract |
This paper examines Rosenzweig?s philosophic project in the context of his time as a critical intervention in the discussion of the place of Jewish thought in the university and in society. If Hermann Cohen represented the first generation of Jewish philosophers claiming that participation in the university is constitutive for the institution?s claim to universalism, the second generation-represented by Martin Buber - was more diffident about the university and its openness. For Buber, literary modernism offered what the university would refuse. Disappointed about the failure of the recognition of the efforts of the previous two generations, Rosenzweig represents the third generation. He turns the situation into a creative response anchoring philosophy as a project that calls for a resolute move outside the university. Ovaj rad ispituje Rozencvajgov filozofski projekat, u kontekstu njegovog vremena, kao kriticku intervenciju u diskusiji o mestu jevrejske misli na univerzitetu i u drustvu. Ako Herman Koen predstavlja prvu generaciju jevrejskih filozofa tvrdeci da je sudelovanje na univerzitetu konstitutivno za zahtev institucije za univerzalizmom, druga generacija? koju je predstavljao Martin Buber - bila je mnogo sumnjicavija oko univerziteta i njegove otvorenosti. Za Bubera, knjizevni modernizam je ponudio nesto sto je univerzitet odbio. Razocaran zbog neuspeha pokusaja da se prepoznaju napori prethodne dve generacije, Rozencvajg predstavlja trecu. On preokrece situaciju u kreativan odgovor usidrenoj filozofiji kao projekat koji poziva na odlucan iskorak van univerziteta.
|
Keywords | university, philosophy, new thinking, speech thinking, “we”/“you” |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
DOI | 10.2298/fid1202065g |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Re/Thinking Critical Thinking: The Seductions of Everyday Life.Kal Alston - 2001 - Studies in Philosophy and Education 20 (1):27-40.
Philosophy, Critical Thinking and Philosophy for Children1.Marie-France Daniel & Emmanuelle Auriac - 2011 - Educational Philosophy and Theory 43 (5):415-435.
Why Critical Thinking Should Be Combined With Written Composition.Donald L. Hatcher - 1999 - Informal Logic 19 (2).
Using a Writing Portfolio Project to Teach Critical Thinking Skills.Jennifer Wilson Mulnix - 2010 - Teaching Philosophy 33 (1):27-54.
Critical Thinking in the Schools: Why Doesn't Much Happen?Ian Wright - 2002 - Informal Logic 22 (2).
The God of the Word and The Divinity of 'Speech'.Wayne Anthony Cristaudo - 2013 - Cosmos and History 9 (2):154-177.
Why Formal Logic is Essential for Critical Thinking.Donald L. Hatcher - 1999 - Informal Logic 19 (1).
Transforming and Redescribing Critical Thinking: Constructive Thinking. [REVIEW]Barbara Thayer-Bacon - 1998 - Studies in Philosophy and Education 17 (2/3):123-148.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2014-01-17
Total views
63 ( #181,381 of 2,506,442 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #416,997 of 2,506,442 )
2014-01-17
Total views
63 ( #181,381 of 2,506,442 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #416,997 of 2,506,442 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads