Neuroethics:1-22 (forthcoming)

Authors
Laura Specker Sullivan
Fordham University
Michelle Trang Pham
University of California, Los Angeles
Phoebe Friesen
McGill University
1 more
Abstract
Advancements in novel neurotechnologies, such as brain computer interfaces and neuromodulatory devices such as deep brain stimulators, will have profound implications for society and human rights. While these technologies are improving the diagnosis and treatment of mental and neurological diseases, they can also alter individual agency and estrange those using neurotechnologies from their sense of self, challenging basic notions of what it means to be human. As an international coalition of interdisciplinary scholars and practitioners, we examine these challenges and make recommendations to mitigate negative consequences that could arise from the unregulated development or application of novel neurotechnologies. We explore potential ethical challenges in four key areas: identity and agency, privacy, bias, and enhancement. To address them, we propose democratic and inclusive summits to establish globally-coordinated ethical and societal guidelines for neurotechnology development and application, new measures, including “Neurorights,” for data privacy, security, and consent to empower neurotechnology users’ control over their data, new methods of identifying and preventing bias, and the adoption of public guidelines for safe and equitable distribution of neurotechnological devices.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s12152-021-09468-6
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 62,388
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Cognitive Enhancement: Methods, Ethics, Regulatory Challenges. [REVIEW]Nick Bostrom - 2009 - Science and Engineering Ethics 15 (3):311-341.
Dimensions of Ethical Direct-to-Consumer Neurotechnologies.Karola V. Kreitmair - 2019 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 10 (4):152-166.

View all 51 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Commentary on "Neurotechnologies, Relational Autonomy, and Authenticity".Anna Gotlib - 2020 - International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics 13 (1):120-128.
What is Required of Requirements?Sara H. Wilford - 2015 - Acm Sigcas Computers and Society 45 (3):348-355.
Introduction to the Special Section: Feminist Approaches to Neurotechnologies.Sara Goering & Laura Specker Sullivan - 2020 - International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics 13 (1):89-97.
Commentary on "Neurotechnologies, Relational Autonomy, and Authenticity".Marya Schechtman - 2020 - International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics 13 (1):129-133.
Making Our Own Luck.David Hodgson - 2007 - Ratio 20 (3):278–292.
Design and Engineering Ethics Considerations for Neurotechnologies.H. F. Machiel van Der Loos - 2007 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 16 (3):303-307.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2021-04-30

Total views
8 ( #974,630 of 2,445,481 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
8 ( #87,624 of 2,445,481 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes