Oxford Literary Review 32 (1):109-130 (2010)
AbstractThis paper wants to think beyond the science-politics divide that is omnipresent in sustainability discourse. With Bruno Latour, we investigate if and how decomposing matters of fact and recomposing them back as matters of concern can open up a scientific-political space in which sustainability challenges can be addressed in an adequate manner. By connecting Latour's constructivist account of science in action with Rudolf Boehm's concept of topical truth, we aim to lighten up the normative-political entanglement between science and politics, facts and values. Rather than conceiving of knowledge in terms of representations of the world, a constructivist topical perspective emphasises the socio-material practices from and within which these representations arise. Such a view then also changes the way we think about ourselves and our place in the world in fundamental ways: the world now becomes something that we are embedded in and part of rather than something we are detached from and merely observers of, as representationalism suggests. In this way, decomposing environmental matters of fact such as climate change, which have never been a human-independent entity out there to begin with, allows to adequately recompose them as societal matters of concern, which they have been from the very beginning.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
References found in this work
No references found.
Citations of this work
Once Upon a Time I Was a Nuclear Physicist: What the Politics of Sustainability Can Learn From the Nuclear Laboratory.Gert Goeminne - 2011 - Perspectives on Science 19 (1):1-31.
Similar books and articles
What is This Thing Called "the Environment"?Avner de-Shalit - 1998 - The Philosophers' Magazine 3:28-29.
What is This Thing Called "the Environment"?Avner de-Shalit - 1998 - The Philosophers' Magazine 3 (3):28-29.
The Nature of Nature as a Stakeholder.Matias Laine - 2010 - Journal of Business Ethics 96 (S1):73-78.
Peri Ti?: Interrogating Rhetoric's Domain.Megan Foley - 2013 - Philosophy and Rhetoric 46 (2):241-246.
What is This Thing Called Happiness? By Fred Feldman. [REVIEW]Alex Gregory - 2013 - Mind 122 (487):fzt092.
Review of Fred Feldman, What is This Thing Called Happiness? [REVIEW]Anthony Skelton - 2013 - Philosophical Quarterly 63 (251):395-398.
Christopher Bennett, What is This Thing Called Ethics? [REVIEW]Jason Kawall - 2012 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 9 (4):589-592.
The Manifest Image and the Scientific Image.Bas C. van Fraassen - 1999 - In Diederik Aerts, Jan Broekaert & Ernest Mathijs (eds.), Einstein Meets Magritte: An Interdisciplinary Reflection. Kluwer Academic Publishers. pp. 29-52.
The Ontological Status of Persons.Lynne Rudder Baker - 2002 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 65 (2):370-388.
Thing-Ing and No-Thing in Heidegger, Kant, and Laozi.Qingjie James Wang - 2016 - Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 15 (2):159-174.
Is the Esse of Intrinsic Value Percipi?: Pleasure, Pain and Value.T. L. S. Sprigge - 2000 - Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 47:119-140.
Limitation and Idealism: Kant's 'Long' Argument From the Categories.Dennis Schulting - 2010 - In Dennis Schulting Jacco Verburgt (ed.), Kant's Idealism. Springer.