Do the Closest Counterfactual Worlds Contain Miracles?

Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 73 (2):137 - 149 (1992)

Abstract
David Lewis and many others hold that the "antecedent-worlds" relevant for the evaluations of most counterfactuals contain violations of the laws of the actual world, or "miracles". But this isn’t necessary. We may think of the counterfactual present "as if" it were the result of an unlawful divergence from actual history, while still extrapolating to a lawful counterfactual past. Not only does this account render miracles unnecessary, it serves as a unified way to evaluate forward and backward counterfactuals
Keywords Counterfactuals   Temporal Asymmetry
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 69,226
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Against Counterfactual Miracles.Cian Dorr - 2016 - Philosophical Review 125 (2):241-286.
Counterfactuals and Laws with Violations.Cameron Gibbs - 2020 - Synthese 198 (11):10643-10659.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2012-06-16

Total views
3 ( #1,353,592 of 2,499,697 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #418,206 of 2,499,697 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes