Assertion: On the Philosophical Significance of Assertoric Speech

New York, NY: Oxford University Press (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX


Sanford C. Goldberg presents a novel account of the speech act of assertion. He argues that this type of speech act is answerable to an epistemic, context-sensitive norm. On this basis he shows the philosophical importance of assertion for key debates in philosophy of language and mind, epistemology, and ethics



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 76,479

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library


Assertion and the Method of Interpretation (Radical and Otherwise)

The aim of this chapter is to argue that the hypothesis that assertion is answerable to a robustly epistemic norm has implications for the nature and method of what Donald Davidson called “the task of radical interpretation.” This is the task of interpreting another’s speech contributions,... see more

Assertion and Assertoric Content

This chapter brings to bear the hypothesis that assertion is answerable to an epistemic norm on further issues pertaining to the interpretation of assertions. By combining some of the results from the previous three chapters, it is argued that this hypothesis can be used to impose some sub... see more

Anonymous Assertion

In this chapter, the hypothesis that assertion is answerable to an epistemic norm is used to illuminate the public nature of assertion. In particular, the aim is to address how the absence of a certain kind of publicness affects assertoric practice. The result is an account of how the anon... see more

Assertion and Disagreement

This chapter develops a problem that arises when thinking about certain contexts in which assertoric practice continues in contexts of what is called systematic peer disagreement. These contexts are a relatively common phenomenon: they obtain when the practice of advancing claims continues... see more

Similar books and articles

In defense of assertion.Brian Montgomery - 2014 - Philosophical Studies 171 (2):313-326.
Putting the Norm of Assertion to Work: the Case of Testimony.Sanford C. Goldberg - 2011 - In Jessica Brown & Herman Cappelen (eds.), Assertion: New Philosophical Essays. Oxford University Press.
The Supportive Reasons Norm of Assertion.Rachel McKinnon - 2013 - American Philosophical Quarterly 50 (2):121-135.
Epistemic invariantism and speech act contextualism.John Turri - 2010 - Philosophical Review 119 (1):77-95.
Cynical Assertion: Convention, Pragmatics, and Saying "Uncle".Tim Kenyon - 2003 - American Philosophical Quarterly 40 (3):241-248.
Knowledge and suberogatory assertion.John Turri - 2013 - Philosophical Studies (3):1-11.
Assertion and relative truth.Ramiro Caso - 2014 - Synthese 191 (6):1309-1325.
Assertion and capitulation.Tim Kenyon - 2010 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 91 (3):352-368.
Dubious assertions.David Sosa - 2008 - Philosophical Studies 146 (2):269 - 272.
The status of the knowledge account of assertion.Frank Hindriks - 2007 - Linguistics and Philosophy 30 (3):393-406.


Added to PP

26 (#449,846)

6 months
5 (#155,590)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Sanford Goldberg
Northwestern University

Citations of this work

Degrees of Assertability.Sam Carter - 2022 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 104 (1):19-49.
The Knowledge Norm for Inquiry.Christopher Willard-Kyle - forthcoming - Journal of Philosophy.
Hedged Assertion.Matthew A. Benton & Peter Van Elswyk - 2020 - In Sanford Goldberg (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Assertion. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 245-263.
Should have known.Sanford C. Goldberg - 2017 - Synthese 194 (8):2863-2894.
Endorsement and assertion.Will Fleisher - 2021 - Noûs 55 (2):363-384.

View all 72 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Gricean Quality.Matthew A. Benton - 2016 - Noûs 50 (4):689-703.

Add more references