Philosophy Compass 4 (4):682-702 (2009)
Constitutional interpretation is problematic because it can be difficult to distinguish legitimate interpretation from illegitimate change. The distinction depends largely on what a constitution is. A constitution, like any other law, necessarily has a meaning, which pre-exists judicial interpretation: it is not a set of meaningless marks on paper. Any plausible constitutional theory must offer an account of the nature of that meaning. In doing so, it must address two main questions. The first is whether the meaning of the constitution is given solely by its words, or also by additional evidence of underlying intentions, purposes or values. The second question is whether, in either case, its meaning is determined by the original meanings, intentions, purposes or values of the founding generation, or by contemporary meanings, intentions, purposes or values. This question divides so-called 'originalists' from 'non-originalists'. This article discusses all these alternatives, and the main arguments for and against them. It is subtitled 'Originalism' because it defends a moderate version of that position; however, it is argued that this is equivalent to a moderate version of non-originalism
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
Collective Intentions and Actions.John Searle - 1990 - In Philip R. Cohen Jerry Morgan & Martha Pollack (eds.), Intentions in Communication. MIT Press. pp. 401-415.
[Book Review] Passions and Constraint, on the Theory of Liberal Democracy. [REVIEW]Stephen Holmes - 1996 - Social Theory and Practice 22 (2).
Citations of this work BETA
Constitutional Interpretation: Non-Originalism.Mitchell N. Berman - 2011 - Philosophy Compass 6 (6):408-420.
Similar books and articles
Why Originalism Won't Die - Common Mistakes in Competing Theories of Judicial Interpretation.Tara A. Smith - unknown
Beguiled by Metaphors: The ‘Living Tree’ and Originalist Constitutional Interpretation in Canada.Bradley Miller - 2009 - Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 22 (2):331-354.
Conservatives, Liberals, Romantics: The Persistent Quest for Certainty in Constitutional Interpretation.Frederick Mark Gedicks - unknown
The Challenge of Originalism: Theories of Constitutional Interpretation.Grant Huscroft & Bradley W. Miller (eds.) - 2011 - Cambridge University Press.
The Case for Originalism.Jeffrey Goldsworthy - 2011 - In Grant Huscroft & Bradley W. Miller (eds.), The Challenge of Originalism: Essays in Constitutional Theory. Cambridge University Press.
Originalism's Constitution.Grégoire C. N. Webber - 2011 - In Grant Huscroft & Bradley W. Miller (eds.), The Challenge of Originalism: Essays in Constitutional Theory. Cambridge University Press.
Added to index2009-06-05
Total downloads117 ( #41,707 of 2,168,588 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #187,166 of 2,168,588 )
How can I increase my downloads?