Can there be a Finite Interpretation of the Kantian Sublime?

Kant Yearbook 11 (1):17-39 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Kant’s account of the sublime makes frequent appeals to infinity, appeals which have been extensively criticised by commentators such as Budd and Crowther. This paper examines the costs and benefits of reconstructing the account in finitist terms. On the one hand, drawing on a detailed comparison of the first and third Critiques, I argue that the underlying logic of Kant’s position is essentially finitist. I defend the approach against longstanding objections, as well as addressing recent infinitist work by Moore and Smith. On the other hand, however, I argue that finitism faces distinctive problems of its own: whilst the resultant theory is a coherent and interesting one, it is unclear in what sense it remains an analysis of the sublime. I illustrate the worry by juxtaposing the finitist reading with analytical cubism.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Crowther and the Kantian Sublime in Art.C. E. Emmer - 2008 - In Valerio Rohden, Ricardo R. Terra & Guido A. de Almeida (eds.), Recht und Frieden in der Philosophie Kants, Akten des X. Internationalen Kant-Kongresses. Walter de Gruyter.
Constructing a Deconstructive Sublime.Peter Gan - 2015 - Journal of Aesthetics and Phenomenology 2 (1):73-91.
The Sublime: From Antiquity to the Present.Timothy M. Costelloe (ed.) - 2012 - Cambridge University Press.
The Kantian Sublime and the Problem of the Political.Alison Ross - 2001 - Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology 32 (2):174-87.
Review: Clewis, The Kantian Sublime and the Revelation of Freedom[REVIEW]Melissa McBay Merritt - 2010 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 18 (3):529-532.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-09-22

Downloads
187 (#66,608)

6 months
45 (#22,425)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Sacha Golob
King's College London

Citations of this work

Kant-Bibliographie 2019.Margit Ruffing - 2021 - Kant Studien 112 (4):623-660.

Add more citations