Evil and a Worthwhile Life

In Reflections on Ethics and Responsibility: Essays in Honor of Peter A. French. Springer. pp. 145-163 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX


The concept of evil plays a central role in many of Peter French’s publications. He defines evil as “a human action that jeopardizes another person’s (or group’s) aspirations to live a worthwhile life (or lives) by the willful infliction of undeserved harm on that person(s)” (French 2011, 61, 95). Inspired by Harry Frankfurt’s work on the importance of what we care about, French argues that “the life a person leads is worthwhile if what he or she really gives a damn about satisfies some condition(s) of value” (2011, 189). Through an analysis of the concept of “worthwhile”, I endeavor to show that French’s account of evil is correct although his definition of a worthwhile life is too demanding. Defining an evil act as one that willfully imperils another’s aspirations to live a worthwhile life is a welcome addition to the philosophical literature dedicated to the analysis of evil. Much of this literature identifies evil as severe, intolerable, or excessive harm, but these descriptions remain vague. When is harm precisely severe, intolerable, or excessive? French provides an original and plausible interpretation of these kinds of evil harm by explaining them in terms of an impediment to aspirations to live a worthwhile life. However, French’s definition of a worthwhile life is too strong and hence excludes unmistakable instances of evil. It is quite possible that someone who cares about nonvaluable things, or someone lacking cares altogether, or non-human animals (who might fall into either one of these two categories), could be victims of evil. Therefore, if evil is an act that jeopardizes another’s aspirations to live a worthwhile life, then the necessary condition of a worthwhile life cannot be that one gives a damn about something of value; it must be something far less demanding. In order to retain the central insight in French’s account of evil, I offer an alternative suggestion concerning what makes a life worthwhile. To this end, I distinguish a worthwhile life from a meaningful, valuable, significant, or good life. Focusing on the definition and use of the word “worthwhile”, I find that a worthwhile life is one that is worth the time and effort of the individual whose life it is. Jeopardizing another’s ability to make such a determination about her life lies at the hardened heart of evil.



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,227

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Learning the virtues at work.Christopher Winch - 2010 - Ethics and Education 5 (2):173-185.
Happiness and the Good Life.John O'Neill - 2008 - Environmental Values 17 (2):125-144.
A Conception of Evil.Paul Formosa - 2008 - Journal of Value Inquiry 42 (2):217-239.
The Evil Person.Fergus Patrick Duniho - 2001 - Dissertation, The University of Rochester
Art: What Matters?Nicholas Friend - 2005 - Arts and Humanities in Higher Education 4 (2):159-172.
Life Worth Living.Thaddeus Metz - 2014 - In Alex Michalos (ed.), Encyclopedia of Quality of Life and Well-being Research. Springer. pp. 3602-05.
The Better Part.Stephen R. L. Clark - 1993 - Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 35:29-49.
The Good Life as Conceptual Art.Hichem Naar - 2010 - American Society for Aesthetics Graduate E-Journal 2 (1):17-23.


Added to PP

76 (#219,215)

6 months
11 (#244,932)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Zachary J. Goldberg
Ludwig Maximilians Universität, München

Citations of this work

Was ist eine böse Handlung?Zachary J. Goldberg - 2019 - Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie 66 (6):764-787.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references