IRB practices and policies regarding the secondary research use of biospecimens

BMC Medical Ethics 16 (1):32 (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

As sharing and secondary research use of biospecimens increases, IRBs and researchers face the challenge of protecting and respecting donors without comprehensive regulations addressing the human subject protection issues posed by biobanking. Variation in IRB biobanking policies about these issues has not been well documented

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 74,569

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Wanted: Human Biospecimens.Karen J. Maschke - 2010 - Hastings Center Report 40 (5):21-23.
Sharing Scientific Data I: New Problems for IRBs.Joan E. Sieber - 1989 - IRB: Ethics & Human Research 11 (6):4.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-05-08

Downloads
28 (#413,491)

6 months
1 (#418,924)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

The Role of IRBs in Research Involving Commerical Biobanks.Mark A. Rothstein - 2002 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 30 (1):105-108.
Currents in Contemporary Ethics.Mark A. Rothstein - 2002 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 30 (1):105-108.

Add more references