BMC Medical Ethics 16 (1):32 (2015)

As sharing and secondary research use of biospecimens increases, IRBs and researchers face the challenge of protecting and respecting donors without comprehensive regulations addressing the human subject protection issues posed by biobanking. Variation in IRB biobanking policies about these issues has not been well documented
Keywords IRBs  Policy  Biobanks  Biospecimens  Data sharing  Genetic research
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1186/s12910-015-0020-1
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 64,046
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Role of IRBs in Research Involving Commerical Biobanks.Mark A. Rothstein - 2002 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 30 (1):105-108.
Currents in Contemporary Ethics.Mark A. Rothstein - 2002 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 30 (1):105-108.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

View all 7 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Wanted: Human Biospecimens.Karen J. Maschke - 2010 - Hastings Center Report 40 (5):21-23.
Sharing Scientific Data I: New Problems for IRBs.Joan E. Sieber - 1989 - IRB: Ethics & Human Research 11 (6):4.


Added to PP index

Total views
27 ( #407,488 of 2,454,442 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #449,269 of 2,454,442 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes