Science as a Vocation. Hermeneutics and Reflection

Epistemology and Philosophy of Science 57 (3):190-200 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this article, the author tries to understand the significance of “Science as a Vocation” for Max Weber’s listeners: what goals and objectives did the speaker set, and what is the relevance of the lecture to understand science and scientists today? As a historical source, the autobiography of K. Levit is used, which recorded the listener’s personal experiences from the speech. Referring to Schleiermacher’s ideas, the author seeks to interpret Weber's speech as Lebenswerk. The author connects the ideas of the speech with the historical context of that time, as well as the philosophy of life and neo-Kantianism. The author believes that Weber’s call for reflection is of key importance for understanding science as vocation. The author comprehends the significance of reflection not only for science, but also for the personality as a whole – for its self-identification and self-knowledge, orientation in the social space.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Beyond interpretation: the meaning of hermeneutics for philosophy.Gianni Vattimo - 1997 - Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press.
Vocational Call.Terrence Wright & Susan Selner-Wright - 2010 - International Philosophical Quarterly 50 (3):323-334.
Vocational Call.Terrence Wright & Susan Selner-Wright - 2010 - International Philosophical Quarterly 50 (3):323-334.
Citizen Science – Science as a Vocation.Evgeny V. Maslanov & Anton V. Dolmatov - 2019 - Epistemology and Philosophy of Science 56 (3):40-44.
The Vocation.Kathy Saile - 2018 - Praxis: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Faith and Justice 1 (1):4-10.
Merton-Popper’s paradox and the substantive rationality of science.Liana A. Tukhvatulina - 2018 - Epistemology and Philosophy of Science 55 (2):49-52.
Why so complicated?Tatiana Sokolova - 2017 - Epistemology and Philosophy of Science 52 (2):47-51.
The Philosophical Status of “Metaphilosophy of Science”.Vladimir N. Porus - 2019 - Epistemology and Philosophy of Science 56 (2):134-150.
The Birth of Philosophy of Science from the Spirit of Victorian Era.Ilya T. Kasavin - 2019 - Epistemology and Philosophy of Science 56 (1):23-33.
Contextualism in philosophy of science.Vladimir N. Porus - 2018 - Epistemology and Philosophy of Science 55 (2):75-93.
History as a Real Process: Historical Science and Philosophy of History.Ю.И Семенов - 2016 - Epistemology and Philosophy of Science 47 (1):50-56.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-08-17

Downloads
7 (#1,351,854)

6 months
4 (#818,853)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references