Social Epistemology: Theory and Applications: Alvin I. Goldman

Alvin Goldman
Rutgers University - New Brunswick
1. Mainstream Epistemology and Social Epistemology Epistemology has had a strongly individualist orientation, at least since Descartes. Knowledge, for Descartes, starts with the fact of one’s own thinking and with oneself as subject of that thinking. Whatever else can be known, it must be known by inference from one’s own mental contents. Achieving such knowledge is an individual, rather than a collective, enterprise. Descartes’s successors largely followed this lead, so the history of epistemology, down to our own time, has been a predominantly individualist affair. There are scattered exceptions. A handful of historical epistemologists gave brief space to the question of knowing, or believing justifiably, based on the testimony of others. Testimony-based knowledge would be one step into a more social epistemology. Hume took it for granted that we regularly rely on the factual statements of others, and argued that it is reasonable to do so if we have adequate reasons for trusting the veracity of these sources. However, reasons for such trust, according to Hume, must rest on personal observations of people’s veracity or reliability.1 Thomas Reid took a different view. He claimed that our natural attitude of trusting others is reasonable even if we know little if anything about others’ reliability. Testimony, at least sincere testimony, is always prima facie credible (Reid, 1970: 240-241). Here we have two philosophers of the 18th century both endorsing at least one element of what nowadays is called “social epistemology.” But these points did not much occupy either Hume’s or Reid’s corpus of philosophical writing; nor were these passages much studied or cited by their contemporaries and immediate successors. Fast forward now to the second half of the 20th century. Here we find intellectual currents pointing toward the socializing of epistemology. Several of these movements, however, were centered outside of philosophy and never adopted the label of “social epistemology,” or adopted it only belatedly.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/S1358246109000022
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 40,000
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge.Imre Lakatos & Alan Musgrave (eds.) - 1970 - Cambridge University Press.
Epistemology and Cognition.Alvin I. Goldman - 1986 - Harvard University Press.
Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature.R. Rorty - 1979 - Princeton University Press.
The Structure of Scientific Revolutions.Thomas S. Kuhn - 1962 - University of Chicago Press.
What is Justified Belief.Alvin I. Goldman - 1979 - In George Pappas (ed.), Justification and Knowledge. Boston: D. Reidel. pp. 1-25.

View all 18 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

The Epistemic Account of Privacy.Martijn Blaauw - 2013 - Episteme 10 (2):167-177.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Knowledge in a Social World.Alvin I. Goldman - 1999 - Oxford University Press.
Alvin I. Goldman's Account of Justification.Jae-Kyung Kim - 1996 - Dissertation, University of California, Santa Barbara
Orienting Social Epistemology.Francis Remedios - 2013 - Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective.
When Experts Disagree.David Coady - 2006 - Episteme 3 (1-2):68-79.
Systems-Oriented Social Epistemology.Alvin Goldman - 2010 - Oxford Studies in Epistemology 3:189-214.
The Need for Social Epistemology.Alvin I. Goldman - 2004 - In Brian Leiter (ed.), The Future for Philosophy. Clarendon Press.


Added to PP index

Total views
212 ( #29,335 of 2,236,152 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #765,248 of 2,236,152 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes

Sign in to use this feature