Authors
Natalie Gold
King's College London
Abstract
Hypothetical trolley problems are widely used to elicit moral intuitions, which are employed in the development of moral theory and the psychological study of moral judgments. The scenarios used are outlandish, and some philosophers and psychologists have questioned whether the judgments made in such unrealistic and unfamiliar scenarios are a reliable basis for theory-building. We present two experiments that investigate whether differences in moral judgment due to the role of the agent, previously found in a standard trolley scenario, persist when the structure of the problem is transplanted to a more familiar context. Our first experiment compares judgments in hypothetical scenarios; our second experiment operationalizes some of those scenarios in the laboratory, allowing us to observe judgments about decisions that are really being made. In the hypothetical experiment, we found that the role effect reversed in our more familiar context, both in judgments about what the actor ought to do and in judgments about the moral rightness of the action. However, in our laboratory experiment, the effects reversed back or disappeared. Among judgments of what the actor ought to do, we found the same role effect as in the standard hypothetical trolley scenario, but the effect of role on moral judgments disappeared.
Keywords Context effects  Decision making  Hypothetical scenarios  Responsibility  Trolley problems
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00035
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

References found in this work BETA

The Secret Joke of Kant’s Soul.Joshua Greene - 2007 - In W. Sinnott-Armstrong (ed.), Moral Psychology, Vol. 3. MIT Press.

View all 25 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Role of Moral Commitments in Moral Judgment.Tania Lombrozo - 2009 - Cognitive Science 33 (2):273-286.
Psychopathy: What Apology Making Tells Us About Moral Agency.Gloria Ayob & Tim Thornton - 2014 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 35 (1):17-29.
Belief Updating in Moral Dilemmas.Zachary Horne, Derek Powell & Joseph Spino - 2013 - Review of Philosophy and Psychology 4 (4):705-714.
Moral Heuristics or Moral Competence? Reflections on Sunstein.John Mikhail - 2005 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (4):557-558.
Hypothetical Moral Situations.Roger R. Straughan - 1975 - Journal of Moral Education 4 (3):183-189.
Moral Judgment and Emotions.Kyle Swan - 2004 - Journal of Value Inquiry 38 (3):375-381.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2014-01-26

Total views
173 ( #55,250 of 2,411,476 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
17 ( #42,724 of 2,411,476 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes