Validity and Reliability of an Instrument for Assessing Case Analyses in Bioengineering Ethics Education

Science and Engineering Ethics 21 (3):789-807 (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Assessment in ethics education faces a challenge. From the perspectives of teachers, students, and third-party evaluators like the Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology and the National Institutes of Health, assessment of student performance is essential. Because of the complexity of ethical case analysis, however, it is difficult to formulate assessment criteria, and to recognize when students fulfill them. Improvement in students’ moral reasoning skills can serve as the focus of assessment. In previous work, Rosa Lynn Pinkus and Claire Gloeckner developed a novel instrument for assessing moral reasoning skills in bioengineering ethics. In this paper, we compare that approach to existing assessment techniques, and evaluate its validity and reliability. We find that it is sensitive to knowledge gain and that independent coders agree on how to apply it

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 74,310

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Validity of National Curriculum Assessment.Gordon Stobart - 2001 - British Journal of Educational Studies 49 (1):26 - 39.
Moral Development and Environmental Ethics.Thomas Craig Swearingen - 1989 - Dissertation, University of Washington
The New Professor of Theology.Jim Mackenzie - 1994 - Journal of Philosophy of Education 28 (1):5–15.
The Reliability of an Instrument.Marcel Boumans - 2004 - Social Epistemology 18 (2 & 3):215 – 246.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-03-28

Downloads
39 (#296,580)

6 months
1 (#415,900)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?