Are necessary and sufficient conditions converse relations?

Australasian Journal of Philosophy 87 (3):375 – 387 (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Claims that necessary and sufficient conditions are not converse relations are discussed, as well as the related claim that If A, then B is not equivalent to A only if B . The analysis of alleged counterexamples has shown, among other things, how necessary and sufficient conditions should be understood, especially in the case of causal conditions, and the importance of distinguishing sufficient-cause conditionals from necessary-cause conditionals. It is concluded that necessary and sufficient conditions, adequately interpreted, are converse relations in all cases.

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-05-07

Downloads
1,430 (#7,303)

6 months
216 (#10,948)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

References found in this work

A philosophical guide to conditionals.Jonathan Bennett - 2003 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Philosophical Guide to Conditionals.Jonathan Bennett - 2003 - Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press UK.
Real Conditionals.William G. Lycan - 2001 - Oxford, England: Oxford: Oxford University Press.
A Philosophical Guide to Conditionals.Jonathan Bennett - 2003 - Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 10 (4):565-570.

View all 26 references / Add more references