Semina Scientiarum 17:55-83 (2020)

Authors
Jakub Gomułka
Pedagogical University of Krakow
Abstract
Stanisław Lem, a philosopher and futurologist, in his many works devoted much attention to the condition of human and the relation between human and technology. He coined the term ‘autoevolution’ in the course of forecasting unlimited technological augmentation of human abilities. Nowadays, the term may be associated with the conceptions presented by transhumanism, a 20th-century-born philosophical movement which advocates radical transformation of Homo sapiens by means of the achievements of scientific and technological progress. Lem’s attitude towards such a transformation of human is complicated yet ultimately critical due to the fact that it poses a threat to human culture as such. The phenomenon of autoevolution undermines existing values and raises a question of authenticity of a future posthuman. We examine dependence between technology and culture, present Lem’s conception of autoevolution and his philosophy of culture, then we sketch a post-metaphysical dispute about authenticity, and finally show that Lem’s thought ­belongs to one of the arguing sides.
Keywords Stanisław Lem  authenticity  autoevolution  transhumanism
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.15633/ss.3515
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Translate to english
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 63,194
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Transhumanism Between Human Enhancement and Technological Innovation.Ion Iuga - 2016 - Symposion: Theoretical and Applied Inquiries in Philosophy and Social Sciences 3 (1):79-88.
Transhumanism, Medical Technology and Slippery Slopes.M. J. McNamee - 2006 - Journal of Medical Ethics 32 (9):513-518.
A Moral Vision for Transhumanism.Patrick D. Hopkins - 2008 - Journal of Evolution and Technology 19 (1):3-7.
Homo Biotechnologicus.Emil Višňovský - 2015 - Human Affairs 25 (2):230-237.
Cryonics: Technological Fictionalization of Death.Rafał Ilnicki - 2018 - Eidos. A Journal for Philosophy of Culture 2 (4):36-45.
Transformation of Bodily Identification in the Context of the Pots-Human Perspectivе.O. Sinkevych - 2013 - Epistemological studies in Philosophy, Social and Political Sciences 4 (23):265-271.
Deconstruction and Excision in Philosophical Posthumanism.David Roden - 2010 - Journal of Evolution and Technology 21 (1):27 - 36.
Transhumanism and Marxism: Philosophical Connections.James Steinhoff - 2014 - Journal of Evolution and Technology 24 (2):1-16.
Religijne aspekty transhumanizmu.Dawid Misztal - 2017 - In Pawel Grabarczyk & Tomasz Sieczkowski (eds.), Granice sacrum. Wymiary religijności w myśli współczesnej. Łódź: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego. pp. 135-156.
Better Living Through Transhumanism.George Dvorsky - 2008 - Journal of Evolution and Technology 19 (1):62-66.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2020-03-07

Total views
8 ( #976,885 of 2,448,337 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #304,685 of 2,448,337 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes