On Being Internally the Same

In Uriah Kriegel (ed.), Oxford Studies in Philosophy of Mind, Vol. 1. OUP (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Internalism and externalism disagree about whether agents who are internally the same can differ in their mental states. But what is it for two agents to be internally the same? Standard formulations take agents to be internally the same in virtue of some metaphysical fact, for example, that they share intrinsic physical properties. Our aim in this chapter is to argue that such formulations should be rejected. We provide the outlines of an alternative formulation on which agents are internally the same in virtue of facts about their epistemic capacities. The resulting formulation is one on which internalism and externalism are views about the extent to which an agent’s mental states can vary independently of the capacity for introspective discrimination. We suggest that this epistemic formulation of internalism and externalism picks out a substantive disagreement in philosophical theorizing about the nature of the mind.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-05-11

Downloads
376 (#63,760)

6 months
126 (#49,091)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Anil Gomes
University of Oxford
Matthew Parrott
King's College London

References found in this work

Knowledge and its limits.Timothy Williamson - 2000 - New York: Oxford University Press.
The meaning of 'meaning'.Hilary Putnam - 1975 - Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science 7:131-193.
Reason, truth, and history.Hilary Putnam - 1981 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
Reference and Consciousness.John Campbell - 2002 - Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press.

View all 46 references / Add more references