The attitude that ordinary language description of experience is in fact a description of the world is called “naïve realism.” There is an entire branch of modern Western philosophy that is devoted to critically examining the assumptions behind the everyday language we use to describe the macroscopic world in which we live and the validity of naïve realism as an adequate description of the world. This branch of philosophy is called “ordinary language philosophy.” Surprisingly, it has something in common with quantum physics: insight into the inadequacy of ordinary language to describe observable reality. It is this connection between ordinary language philosophy and quantum physics that we shall explore in this article. In the process, we shall also offer a basic introduction to both basic philosophy and basic quantum theory
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Quantum Theory and the Observation Problem.Ravi V. Gomatam - 1999 - Journal of Consciousness Studies 6 (11-12):11-12.
Do Hodgson's Propositions Uniquely Characterize Free Will?Ravi Gomatam - 2005 - Journal of Consciousness Studies 12 (1):32-40.
When Words Are Called For: A Defense of Ordinary Language Philosophy.Avner Baz - 2012 - Harvard University Press.
Popper's Propensity Interpretation and Heisenberg's Potentia Interpretation.Ravi V. Gomatam - unknown
Reconsidering Ordinary Language Philosophy: Malcolm’s (Moore’s) Ordinary Language Argument.Sally Parker Ryan - 2010 - Essays in Philosophy 11 (2):123-149.
Chomsky on the 'Ordinary Language' View of Language.Francis Y. Lin - 1999 - Synthese 120 (2):151-191.
Added to index2012-06-15
Total downloads26 ( #198,133 of 2,177,988 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #166,811 of 2,177,988 )
How can I increase my downloads?