Argument Has No Function

Informal Logic 27 (1):69-90 (2007)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Douglas Walton has been right in calling us to attend to the pragmatics of argument. He has, however, also insisted that arguments should be understood and assessed by considering the functions they perform; and from this, I dissent. Argument has no determinable function in the sense Walton needs, and even if it did, that function would not ground norms for argumentative practice. As an alternative to a functional theory of argumentative pragmatics, I propose a design view, which draws attention to the way participants strategically undertake and impose norms on themselves in order for their arguments to have force

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,098

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Commentary on: Douglas Walton and Thomas F. Gordon's "How to formalize informal logic".Marcin Koszowy & Marcin Selinger - 2013 - Virtues of Argumentation. Proceedings of the 10th International Conference of the Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation (OSSA), 22-26 May 2013, Windsor:1-7.
Informal Logic: A Pragmatic Approach.Douglas Walton - 2008 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
The Resolution Function of Argument.Tom Wiwcharuk - 1990 - Dissertation, York University (Canada)
A Pragmatic Theory of Fallacy.Douglas Walton - 2003 - University Alabama Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-24

Downloads
89 (#196,196)

6 months
34 (#104,348)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?