Argument Has No Function

Informal Logic 27 (1):69-90 (2005)
Abstract
Douglas Walton has been right in calling us to attend to the pragmatics of argument. He has, however, also insisted that arguments should be understood and assessed by considering the functions they perform; and from this, I dissent. Argument has no determinable function in the sense Walton needs, and even if it did, that function would not ground norms for argumentative practice. As an alternative to a functional theory of argumentative pragmatics, I propose a design view, which draws attention to the way participants strategically undertake and impose norms on themselves in order for their arguments to have force
Keywords dialogue  pragmatics.Argument has no function  Walton, Douglas  functionalism  argument  argumentation  dialectics  argument-evaluation  informal-logic
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2007
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 33,066
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

View all 8 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2013-11-24

Total downloads
14 ( #386,466 of 2,241,595 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #234,272 of 2,241,595 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature