A suspicious feature of the popper/miller argument

Philosophy of Science 57 (3):535-536 (1990)
Abstract
The form of argument used by Popper and Miller to attack the concept of probabilistic induction is applied to the slightly different situation in which some evidence undermines a hypothesis. The result is seemingly absurd, thus bringing the form of argument under suspicion.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1086/289573
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 38,086
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
186 ( #33,091 of 2,313,336 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #366,294 of 2,313,336 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature