A Search for Unity in Diversity : The "Permanent Hegelian Deposit" in the Philosophy of John Dewey

Lexington Books (2005)
  Copy   BIBTEX


This study demonstrates that Dewey did not reject Hegelianism during the 1890s, as scholars maintain, but developed a humanistic/historicist reading that was indebted to an American Hegelian tradition. Scholars have misunderstood the "permanent Hegelian deposit" in Dewey's thought because they have not fully appreciated this American Hegelian tradition and have assumed that his Hegelianism was based primarily on British neo-Hegelianism. ;The study examines the American reception of Hegel in the nineteenth-century by intellectuals as diverse as James Marsh and Frederic Henry Hedge and how it flowered in late nineteenth-century St. Louis. The St. Louis Hegelians read Hegel as a particularly practical and politically liberal philosopher whose social philosophy promoted both social diversity and unity. Led by W. T. Harris, they studied Hegel in German and published their own scholarship, as well as translations of German scholarship, in their Journal of Speculative Philosophy. Their efforts to make "Hegel talk English" and to base the St. Louis public schools on Hegel's philosophy of education won them national, and even, international attention. The St. Louis Hegelians sought to adapt Hegel's thought to their American context by assuaging elitist elements within it; Dewey's intellectual development was profoundly shaped by their appropriation of his philosophy. ;Dewey drew upon Hegel's argument that humans form societies because of their differences, not in spite of them. Hegel's rejection of the self-sufficient, atomistic individual entailed that the individual is dependent upon others for the satisfaction of material needs. Moreover, like Hegel, Dewey rejected the hedonistic basis of the British political tradition by arguing that humans seek recognition from their equals as well as satisfaction of material needs. Dewey believed Hegel's emphasis upon equality and diversity provided a model of society in which there was fertile ground for the individual to conceive and articulate cultural criticism. The study ends by comparing recent Hegel scholarship to Dewey's, demonstrating that American Hegelianism has returned, in important ways, to a Deweyan reading of Hegel



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,998

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Dewey's “permanent Hegelian deposit”: A reply to Hickman and Alexander.James Good - 2008 - Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 44 (4):pp. 577-602.
Dewey's Hegel: A search for unity in diversity, or diversity as the growth of unity?Larry A. Hickman - 2008 - Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 44 (4):pp. 569-576.
John Dewey's "Permanent Hegelian Deposit" and the Exigencies of War.James Allan Good - 2006 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 44 (2):293-313.
Dewey: A beginner's guide (review).Raymond D. Boisvert - 2010 - Education and Culture 26 (2):94-98.
Comments on James good, a search for unity in diversity.Thomas Alexander - 2008 - Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 44 (4):pp. 563-568.
Religion, unity and diversity.Ibrahim Kalin - 2011 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 37 (4):471-478.
Pragmatism : Diversity of subjects in Dewey's philosophy and the present Dewey scholarship.Stefan Neubert - 2009 - In Larry A. Hickman, Stefan Neubert & Kersten Reich (eds.), John Dewey between pragmatism and constructivism. New York: Fordham University Press.


Added to PP

38 (#420,102)

6 months
13 (#195,089)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Introduction.Robert Stern - 2015 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 23 (4):601-610.
The Naturalistic Side of Hegel’s Pragmatism.Emmanuel Renault - 2012 - Critical Horizons 13 (2):244 - 274.
Jane Addams and John Dewey.Shane J. Ralston - 2022 - In Patricia Shields, Maurice Hamington & Joseph Soeters (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Jane Addams. Oxford UK: Oxford University Press.

View all 13 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references