Consequentialism, agent-neutrality, and mahāyāna ethics

Philosophy East and West 58 (1):17-35 (2008)
Abstract
: What kinds of comparisons can legitimately be made between Mahāyāna Buddhism and Western ethical theories? Mahāyānists aspire to alleviate the suffering, promote the happiness, and advance the moral perfection of all sentient beings. This aspiration is best understood as expressing a form of universalist consequentialism. Many Indian Mahāyāna texts seem committed to claims about agent-neutrality that imply consequentialism and are not compatible with virtue ethics. Within the Mahāyāna tradition, there is some diversity of views: Asaṅga seems to hold a complex and interesting version of rule consequentialism, whereas Śāntideva is closer to act consequentialism
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1353/pew.2008.0013
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 34,562
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total downloads
86 ( #72,551 of 2,268,311 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #373,468 of 2,268,311 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature