Clubbish justice

Politics, Philosophy and Economics 7 (2):233-237 (2008)
Abstract
Kai Spiekermann shows how groups of people cooperating purely for mutual advantage could solve social dilemmas by `assortation', deftly including and excluding people from the group of people who are cooperating among themselves. This article explores the normative implications of that result, casting further doubt on normative models treating justice as a `club good'. Key Words: justice • club • non-ideal theory.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1177/1470594X08088730
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 27,678
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Reply: Clubbish Justice.Kai Spiekermann - 2008 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 7 (4):447-453.
Hume and Mutual Advantage.J. Salter - 2012 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 11 (3):302-321.
Justice as Mutual Advantage and the Vulnerable.P. Vanderschraaf - 2011 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 10 (2):119-147.
Justice: A Conservative View.John Kekes - 2006 - Social Philosophy and Policy 23 (2):88-108.
Elements of Justice.David Schmidtz - 2006 - Cambridge University Press.
Social Justice and Legal Justice.Wojciech Sadurski - 1984 - Law and Philosophy 3 (3):329 - 354.

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2009-01-28

Total downloads

28 ( #182,985 of 2,170,061 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

1 ( #345,514 of 2,170,061 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums