Disarming nuclear apologists

Here I distinguish the four logically possible ways in which nuclear weapons might be used: in an all?out nuclear strike, either first or second; or in a limited strike, either first or second. I go on to show that neither of the two most basic moral perspectives, consequentialistic or deontological, would permit nuclear weapons to be used in any of those four ways; nor would they permit an empty threat to use them. Nuclear weapons are thus shown to be morally useless. Given the moral opportunity costs of maintaining this morally useless arsenal, nuclear weapons should therefore be abandoned, universally if possible and unilaterally if need be
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1080/00201748508602050
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 44,474
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Utilitarianism: For and Against.J. J. C. Smart & Bernard Williams - 1973 - Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Modern Moral Philosophy.G. E. M. Anscombe - 1958 - Philosophy 33 (124):1 - 19.
Collective Action.Russell Hardin - 1984 - Ethics 94 (2):336-339.
Proportionality and Time.Jeff McMahan - 2015 - Ethics 125 (3):696-719.

View all 20 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Who Can Endeavour Peace?Onora O'neill - 1986 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 16 (sup1):41-73.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles


Added to PP index

Total views
25 ( #353,038 of 2,273,296 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #405,965 of 2,273,296 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes

Sign in to use this feature