Faith and Philosophy 4 (3):304-318 (1987)
This paper describes a strategy for defending some of the core claims of Christianity from evidentialist critics. The strategy is neither epistemological nor based on considerations of ‘proper basicality’. Indeed, this strategy, if successful, shows Christian faith to be notmerely permissible but ethically obligatory. It does so by taking seriously the claim that faith is a virtue (in the classical sense) and that a reflecting conscience will discover this. The paper also hopes to contribute to Kierkegaard scholarship by offering a new interpretation both of Sickness Unto Death and, by implication, of Kierkegaard’s general significance for philosophy of religion
|Keywords||Contemporary Philosophy Philosophy and Religion|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Fear and Trembling: Kierkegaard's Christian Work.Jerome I. Gellmann - 2001 - Faith and Philosophy 18 (1):61-74.
A Reconsideration of Kierkegaard's Understanding of the Human Other: The Hidden Ethics of Soteriology.Leo Stan - 2010 - Journal of Religious Ethics 38 (2):349-370.
The Offense of Reason and the Passion of Faith.Karen L. Carr - 1996 - Faith and Philosophy 13 (2):236-251.
Kierkegaard on Truth as Subjectivity: Christianity, Ethics and Asceticism.Christopher Hamilton - 1998 - Religious Studies 34 (1):61-79.
Kierkegaard and the Classical Virtue Tradition.Mark A. Tietjen - 2010 - Faith and Philosophy 27 (2):153-173.
Living Within the Sacred Tension: Kierkegaard's Climacean Works as a Guide for Christian Existence.Matthew T. Nowachek - 2013 - Heythrop Journal 54 (2):883-902.
Added to index2011-01-09
Total downloads16 ( #296,158 of 2,163,694 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #348,043 of 2,163,694 )
How can I increase my downloads?