Faith and Philosophy 4 (3):304-318 (1987)

Authors
Patrick Goold
Virginia Wesleyan College
Abstract
This paper describes a strategy for defending some of the core claims of Christianity from evidentialist critics. The strategy is neither epistemological nor based on considerations of ‘proper basicality’. Indeed, this strategy, if successful, shows Christian faith to be notmerely permissible but ethically obligatory. It does so by taking seriously the claim that faith is a virtue and that a reflecting conscience will discover this. The paper also hopes to contribute to Kierkegaard scholarship by offering a new interpretation both of Sickness Unto Death and, by implication, of Kierkegaard’s general significance for philosophy of religion.
Keywords Contemporary Philosophy  Philosophy and Religion
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s) 0739-7046
DOI faithphil19874330
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 64,262
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Kierkegaard and the Faith of Chinese Christians in Business.Dennis P. Mccann - 2013 - Journal of Chinese Philosophy 40 (1):143-163.
The Significance of Doctrine in Kierkegaard's Journals: Beyond an Impasse in English Language Kierkegaard Scholarship.Lee C. Barrett - 2008 - Journal for the History of Modern Theology/Zeitschrift für Neuere Theologiegeschichte 15 (1):16-31.
Faith as a Passion and Virtue.Ryan West - 2013 - Res Philosophica 90 (4):565-587.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2011-01-09

Total views
29 ( #379,902 of 2,455,627 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #225,855 of 2,455,627 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes