The Perceived Objectivity of Ethical Beliefs: Psychological Findings and Implications for Public Policy [Book Review]
Review of Philosophy and Psychology 1 (2):161-188 (2010)
Ethical disputes arise over differences in the content of the ethical beliefs people hold on either side of an issue. One person may believe that it is wrong to have an abortion for financial reasons, whereas another may believe it to be permissible. But, the magnitude and difficulty of such disputes may also depend on other properties of the ethical beliefs in question—in particular, how objective they are perceived to be. As a psychological property of moral belief, objectivity is relatively unexplored, and we argue that it merits more attention. We review recent psychological evidence which demonstrates that individuals differ in the extent to which they perceive ethical beliefs to be objective, that some ethical beliefs are perceived to be more objective than others, and that both these sources of variance are somewhat systematic. This evidence also shows that differences in perceptions of objectivity underpin quite different psychological reactions to ethical disagreement. Apart from reviewing this evidence, our aim in this paper is to draw attention to unanswered psychological questions about moral objectivity, and to discuss the relevance of moral objectivity to two issues of public policy.
|Keywords||Philosophy Philosophy of Science Developmental Psychology Neuropsychology Epistemology Cognitive Psychology Philosophy of Mind|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
Wise Choices, Apt Feelings: A Theory of Normative Judgment.Allan Gibbard - 1990 - Harvard University Press.
Citations of this work BETA
Folk Moral Relativism.Hagop Sarkissian, John Park, David Tien, Jennifer Wright & Joshua Knobe - 2011 - Mind and Language 26 (4):482-505.
Further Problems with Projectivism.Thomas Pölzler - 2016 - South African Journal of Philosophy 35 (1):92-102.
Varying Versions of Moral Relativism: The Philosophy and Psychology of Normative Relativism.Katinka Quintelier & Daniel Fessler - 2012 - Biology and Philosophy 27 (1):95-113.
Mind the Gap(S): Sociality, Morality, and Oxytocin. [REVIEW]Benjamin James Fraser - 2014 - Biology and Philosophy 29 (1):143-150.
Similar books and articles
The Meta-Ethical Grounding of Our Moral Beliefs: Evidence for Meta-Ethical Pluralism.Jennifer C. Wright, Piper T. Grandjean & Cullen B. McWhite - 2012 - Philosophical Psychology 26 (3):336-361.
Ethical and Fair Work Behaviour: A Normative-Empirical Dialogue Concerning Ethics and Justice. [REVIEW]M. S. Singer - 2000 - Journal of Business Ethics 28 (3):187 - 209.
Ethical Beliefs' Differences of Males and Females.J. Tsalikis & M. Ortiz-Buonafina - 1990 - Journal of Business Ethics 9 (6):509-517.
Ethical Beliefs' Differences of Males and Females M. Ortiz-Buonafina.J. Tsalikis - 1990 - Journal of Business Ethics 9 (6):509 - 517.
Ethical Practices and Beliefs of Psychopathology Researchers.Sandra T. Sigmon - 1995 - Ethics and Behavior 5 (4):295 – 309.
An Examination of the Ethical Beliefs of Managers Using Selected Scenarios in a Cross-Cultural Environment.Russell Abratt, Deon Nel & Nicola Susan Higgs - 1992 - Journal of Business Ethics 11 (1):29 - 35.
Ethical Thought in Public Relations History: Seeking a Relevant Perspective.Genevieve McBride - 1989 - Journal of Mass Media Ethics 4 (1):5 – 20.
Objectivity and Illusion in Evolutionary Ethics: Comments on Waller.Peter G. Woolcock - 2000 - Biology and Philosophy 15 (1):39-60.
Added to index2010-03-07
Total downloads121 ( #37,876 of 2,146,212 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #227,266 of 2,146,212 )
How can I increase my downloads?
There are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.