The Public Sphere and the Norms of Transactional Argument

Informal Logic 25 (2):151-165 (2005)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

An outsider to argument theory, should she look through the rich outpouring of our recent work, might be amused to find us theorists not following our own prescriptions. We propound our ideas, but we don't always interact with each other--we don't argue. The essays by William Rehg and Robert Asen make promising start on rectifying this difficulty. I want to discuss them, first, to show how they acknowledge in exemplary fashion a pair of challenges I think we should all be addressing; and next to consider their specific responses

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,322

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The public sphere.Jostein Gripsrud (ed.) - 2010 - London: SAGE.
Milestones in the Critique of the Public Sphere: Dewey and Arendt.Codruţa Cuceu - 2011 - Journal for Communication and Culture 1 (2):99-110.
Setting up a new model of the democratic theory ‐ research on Habermas’ theory of public sphere.Cui Zhang - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 50:1095-1103.
The prudential public sphere.David Randall - 2011 - Philosophy and Rhetoric 44 (3):205-226.
The Impossibility of the Public.Hsin-I. Liu - 2006 - The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 2:119-124.
Applicability and effectiveness of legal norms.E. P. & J. J. - 1997 - Law and Philosophy 16 (2):201-219.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-10-30

Downloads
37 (#419,437)

6 months
30 (#103,657)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?