Southern Journal of Philosophy 41 (2):183-197 (2003)
Most philosophers would say that fictional characters lack spatiotemporal location simply because such entities do not exist. However, even prominent believers in ficta hold that they must lack location. I here focus on the views of one such believer, Amie Thomasson, and her Artifactual Theory. The fundamentals of her ontology seem correct, but I argue that the view implies that ficta do have location. I provide a diagnosis of an argument Thomasson gives for the contrary, and then suggest a way for the Artifactual Theory to account for the locations of ficta. I conclude by discussing some potential applications of this contribution to other areas of philosophy
|Keywords||Analytic Philosophy Contemporary Philosophy General Interest|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Similar books and articles
Could Sherlock Holmes Have Existed?Hanoch Ben-Yami - 2010 - Croatian Journal of Philosophy 10 (3):175-181.
Sherlock Holmes ‐ Philosopher Detective.Wulf Rehder - 1979 - Inquiry : An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 22 (1-4):441-457.
A Defense of Creationism in Fiction.Jeffrey Goodman - 2004 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 67 (1):131-155.
"You Know My Method": A Juxtaposition of Charles S. Peirce and Sherlock Holmes.Thomas A. Sebeok - 1980 - Gaslight Publications.
Added to index2009-02-25
Total downloads92 ( #56,409 of 2,171,798 )
Recent downloads (6 months)7 ( #40,690 of 2,171,798 )
How can I increase my downloads?